Real Nickey?

[427.060]

[ QUOTE ]
What the hell does THAT mean? I've talked to the seller via e-mail/ He CLEARLY states that in NO WAY is he implying the car ORIGINALLY was a NICKEY car in 1969, He states the car was sold by Nickey recently and Nickey certifies. that it is an ORIGINAL Z-28, not a clone.

I don't see where this guy has misrepresented this car in any way. He did nothing other than use Nickeys name as a reference that a respected , trusted musclecar name had once owned and inspected this car. In My opinion, perhaps some of the posters in this thread should have just asked the seller the same questions I did, rather than guess out loud, perhaps at the sellers expense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry Jim but I don't agree. The title and desrciption both say 1969 Nickey Camaro. The description mentions documentation but never says that it is only documented as a real Z-28. The seller is being very vague. If it were as plain as you seem to think it is this discussing would have never been posted here.
I'm not knocking Stephano but I think he should reword the documents in the future to make it a little more clear. JMO
James