![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks great, I like it. Your car in the picture doesn't appear to sit any higher than mine.
I ordered a set. I'll check the back spacing and go from there. I have a couple different plans of attack if I run into any issues. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just something to note. You mentioned your top inner fender bolt touching.
I don't know if this is factory or not, because they have been there since the mid 80's (as far as I know about the car) but mine have very shallow hex head bolts in those locations (12 o'clock) on both sides, and I assume it's just for that reason, more tire clearance. They are very shallow heads, tricky to keep a wrench or socket on them. I'd guess they aren't more than an 1/8" thick. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
1970 Chevelle SS LS5 - 79k original miles, Tripple Black, build sheet 1969 Camaro SS/RS X22 - 548 with 5 spd, Hugger Orange, Houdstooth Interior |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Even as the car is now with stock rallys and 215/65's, as I mentioned once in a great while when turning and backing up I hear a tire rub at full lock. Both of those shallow bolt heads are "polished" LOL Wouldn't bother me at all to switch the front to a 215-70 (stock size) if need be. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wheels arrived today (however without lug nuts and valves stems that are supposed to be included)
Anyway, the back spacing is indeed 3.75" as measured from the outer wheel lip. The wheel also weighs 19 lbs. for those interested. I won't get a chance to dismount tires until Saturday. I'll start with the front first since that's likely the trouble spot and see how things fit. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|