Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
01-25-2013, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
Even though it is a low mileage car, it is still an old car. The factory engine paint really sucked and did not look good for long. I had a low mile 67 chevelle and the engine paint was all dried and cracked and peeling. It did not match the mileage or the condition of the rest or the car. It had bad valve seals, so i pulled the engine and replaced all engine gaskets and repainted the engine and reinstalled.
__________________
67 Z28, 67 RS/SS 396 Canadian, 73 Camaro Z28/LT Carolina Blue 
|
|
#2
01-25-2013, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
---Correct, Roger! I would never judge a low mile car because of the engine detail. Id probably rather not have it done and make that decision myself, but a true low mile car is distinguishable a bunch of other ways other than the paint on the engine........Bill S
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
