1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

Has this one been discussed before?

http://ontario.kijiji.ca/c-cars-vehicles...QAdIdZ450591255

Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

Why repaint the engine on a car with miles like that?

Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

People just do Stuff. He probably thought , oh this will look better & just not thinking about how enthusiasts like Unrestored Patina.

Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

Even though it is a low mileage car, it is still an old car. The factory engine paint really sucked and did not look good for long. I had a low mile 67 chevelle and the engine paint was all dried and cracked and peeling. It did not match the mileage or the condition of the rest or the car. It had bad valve seals, so i pulled the engine and replaced all engine gaskets and repainted the engine and reinstalled.

Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

---Correct, Roger! I would never judge a low mile car because of the engine detail. Id probably rather not have it done and make that decision myself, but a true low mile car is distinguishable a bunch of other ways other than the paint on the engine........Bill S

Re: 1967 Camaro RS.7000 original miles.
 

Probably a nice car, but it would appear that it is probably not a &quot;one owner&quot; car as advertised. Maybe it's a &quot;one owner&quot; as opposed to a &quot;no owner&quot; [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/confused.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]