Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#15
08-08-2025, 04:16 AM
|
||||
|
||||
That 2nd and 3rd page of McNeish report sums up some suspicions.
Things that I see that raise questions NCRS says car was built 4-1-69, but rear is dated 3-31? POP - is it a repop? McNeish questions it. Says dealer stamp is not legit In the handwritten notes pic 330 - Aug 3, 2003 - new shortblock rebuilt? So is the really the born with engine? That dealer invoice looks too fresh and made up, MacNeish questions it also. Was POP made up to match the current drive line? I like the Trans stamp. Engine pad stamp but not sure about the VIN stamp on the engine. I question the 3/31 rear (no stamping pic) in a 4/1 built car. Kurt S is the expert on POPs If the POP is in question by McNeish, then you got to wonder. The other docs are suspect.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode