1967 camaro

Kim_Howie · #1 07-22-2005, 12:24 AM

Take a look at the 4k on this trim tag http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...item=4561917530

Mr. T · #2 07-22-2005, 12:54 AM

I think both the 2LG and 4k codes look very suspicious, compared to the 3SL code, which IMO is authentic/original to the tag.

**SS427** · #3 07-22-2005, 01:03 AM

Not to mention the pop rivets holding the tag on.

Kim_Howie · #4 07-22-2005, 01:05 AM

The car is too early for a 396 isn't it ???

**Salvatore** · #5 07-22-2005, 01:29 AM

Is that mold in the back seat?

**Rick H** · #6 07-22-2005, 04:57 AM

[ QUOTE ]
The car is too early for a 396 isn't it ???

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually December 1966 was when the 396 became available. Seeing that it is a 1st week December car it just might be. I said might. The 4K looks strange to me as well.

What's up with that grill emblem? If that car is a BB 396 car then why have a SS 350 emblem? I got it, they forgot to remove the grill emblem when he swapped out the motor. Yeah, that's it.

Plus, what RPO is that space saver tire??

Rick H.

**Steve Shauger** · #7 07-22-2005, 06:02 AM

This car is coded as an L78 (4K), and from my research this option was introduced sometime in March of 67. There is no way that this car is a true 12A built L78. The L35 was introduced prior to the L78 and 12A is too early for that.

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.