![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am trying to find what these original Delco spiral rear shocks go to. One is #3192453 dated 202-68. The other is #4975155 dated 350 72. Any help would be appriciated.
Thanks.
__________________
1968 Z/28 34,000 mile, born with engine and trans, Shipper, California car, Fathom Blue, deluxe interior, M21, 3.55 Posi 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire, Factory all Aluminum V8 Turbocharged and Methanol Injected TURBO ROCKET engine, 4 speed Hydramatic, 4 link rear suspension, 3.36 Anti-Spin differential, California car, PS, PB, PW, AC, Jetfire 2 option package. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The #3192453 is a rear spiral shock for the 1969-70 Impala-Biscayne-Bel Air-Caprice series,but NOT with a 427 or 454cid or Heavy duty Suspension or Super Sport or Taxi or Station Wagons or Air boosters or Heavy Duty chassis..i.e.Budd Frame.
The #4975155 is a L/H rear spiral shock for a 1973-74 Chevelle series,but NOT Station Wagons or El Caminos. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks very much mr70. I've had them laying around for 14 years I think I'll sell them.
__________________
1968 Z/28 34,000 mile, born with engine and trans, Shipper, California car, Fathom Blue, deluxe interior, M21, 3.55 Posi 1962 Oldsmobile Jetfire, Factory all Aluminum V8 Turbocharged and Methanol Injected TURBO ROCKET engine, 4 speed Hydramatic, 4 link rear suspension, 3.36 Anti-Spin differential, California car, PS, PB, PW, AC, Jetfire 2 option package. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You're Welcome Greg.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick, Did you write the book for Chevy?
![]() ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No but he must have every damn catalog/manual/piece of paper that Chevrolet printed !!
__________________
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to hijack this post, but one of the posts above insinuates that Budd frames were heavy duty - From all of my research, I was under the impression that the three frame suppliers: A.O. Smith, Flint Frames and Budd, supplied the same type of frame. They were all the same. Can anybody comment on this? If Budd did make a heavier duty frame, what was different about it?
Thanks
__________________
Rob M. '68 L-72 Biscayne, M22 4-speed |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Rob:
I will let the experts comment but I have never seen any major differences.It seemed the manufacturer of your frame was determined based on the location of where your car was built. I have taken Budd frames out of 6 cylinder cars and we have two in our 427 cars.Have to love the SO cal ones. ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's how I understood it too. Jon Krogh also told me the same thing... And he has taken apart scores of cars. You never know though...
![]()
__________________
Rob M. '68 L-72 Biscayne, M22 4-speed |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's my personal "i.e." reference after Heavy Duty that I believe Chevrolet really used in that situation back then.
Of the few heavy duty suspensions I have seen in person on any GM B-body,Buick-Olds-Pontiac-Chevrolet,all have had Budd frames. I can't find it right now,but somewhere I have a internal product bulletin stating Chevrolet preferred to use that manufacturers frames when special heavy duty suspensions were requested before assembly. It when on to say because Budd used a heavier gauge steel on it's one piece tunnel bottom & welded on channel rails then other similar frame manufacturers at that time,GM preferred to use them more in case of warranty issues. I think Parish Pressed Steel later on adapted to this design as well.. |
![]() |
|
|