Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pit Area - Racing


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2009, 05:29 PM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default motor size

We'll I got the speed bug..want to build a bigger/more HP motor for the Malibu. Have another Zl-1 block and heads..How big do I go?..454 or +1/4 stroker? pros and cons of each?.expieriences?...let the learning curve begin ..thanks

Albert
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 07-03-2009, 06:06 PM
370454s 370454s is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Morrilton, Arkansas
Posts: 676
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: motor size

How about a 496?
Mike
__________________
2010 Black Challenger SRT-8 6 Speed
2010 Purple Challenger R/T Classic
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2009, 06:26 PM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: motor size

[ QUOTE ]
How about a 496?
Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

forgot to say..std bore block..why bore it
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2009, 11:09 PM
92646 92646 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orange county Ca.
Posts: 1,403
Thanks: 3
Thanked 32 Times in 20 Posts
Default Re: motor size

I would recommend that you put the ZL1 block away for another project and build something with an aftermarket aluminum block. For the money it is hard to beat the value of a 540,572 or 632, when they are built right they will last forever. You do not have spin them more than 6000 rpm to make power and there is a bunch of torque available from the moment you hit the throttle.
Mark Sheppard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-04-2009, 12:46 AM
1969l78 1969l78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,901
Thanks: 36
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Default Re: motor size

I agree with Mark. Here is a video of my 540 dart block and dart head set up. 725 horse and runs on pump gas. And will run 10's all day possible 9's with a day of tunning at track. Plus I can drive it anywhere. But the 454 stroker would be cool also. Good luck.


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-04-2009, 01:43 AM
VintageMusclecar's Avatar
VintageMusclecar VintageMusclecar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 183
Thanked 186 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: motor size

Start with the basics first:

What are your performance goals?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:11 AM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: motor size

[ QUOTE ]
Start with the basics first:

What are your performance goals?

[/ QUOTE ]

Im looking for a reliable street worthy motor to go low 11's. Want it to look somewhat stock using a ZL-1 block and 074 heads, headers, 198/163 intake. I fugure more displacement will yield more torque which would help my somewhat heavy 69 Chevelle 3800/3900 lbs. All I have is the block and heads..If I have to buy a crank kit..bigger is better..right??

ALbert
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-07-2009, 05:13 AM
Alss's Avatar
Alss Alss is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The tax State of New Jersey
Posts: 2,542
Thanks: 19
Thanked 54 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: motor size

[ QUOTE ]
I would recommend that you put the ZL1 block away for another project and build something with an aftermarket aluminum block. For the money it is hard to beat the value of a 540,572 or 632, when they are built right they will last forever. You do not have spin them more than 6000 rpm to make power and there is a bunch of torque available from the moment you hit the throttle.
Mark Sheppard

[/ QUOTE ]

Mark, you are probably right..but I already have the block..and another block is not in the budget..but 540 inches...Hmmmmmm thats sounds cool, but 480+ inches aint bad either
__________________
1969 9566AA COPO Chevelle M-22
1969 Malibu 489 ZL-1 T-56/4.56
1969 Beaumont 540 th400 3.70
1969 Chevelle 300 Deluxe 427 ZL-1 M 22W
1970 Olds 442 W 30 2 door post
1969 Ply. GTX 426 hemi auto. Blue.
1940 Dodge pick up Durango 4X4
1968 Camaro ragtop LSA ZL1
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-07-2009, 07:32 PM
VintageMusclecar's Avatar
VintageMusclecar VintageMusclecar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 183
Thanked 186 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: motor size

Low 11's is easy even at 3800+ lbs, and you can do it with 460" or 490", whichever you prefer.

As an aside, since I'm not familiar with the new ZL-1 blocks, does anyone know how much clearance work would be required to get a 1/4" arm to clear?

Two main things to keep in mind:

1) E.T. isn't just about horsepower and torque; e.t. is about utilizing the horsepower and torque you have in the most efficient manner, i.e. getting to the 60', 330' and 660' clocks as quickly as possible.

2: The more low end power you make, the more work it's going to require to hook the car consistently. Fortunately there are a myriad of bolt-on suspension systems out there for GM A bodies, which means that 90% of the work has already been done for you. The other 10% is simply deciding which system to go with, and making whatever subsequent fine-tuning refinements are necessary after the system has been installed.

Back to the engine;

An "honest" 550 flywheel HP is all it would take to put a 3800 lb ride deep into the 11 second zone in a properly prepared car. You can make that with <11-1 compression and a decent flat tappet cam with what you already have. The 490" will make the power a little sooner (rpm-wise) and will have a more abundant torque curve down low.

Personally, provided the block will swallow the 1/4" crank w/o too much trouble, I would opt for the extra cubic inches since you're already starting from scratch and those extra 30" don't cost any more to build.

Wrapping the build up with a good converter, decent gearing and some sticky tires will net you your desired results, and it should be about as fussy as an anvil.

Eric

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Start with the basics first:

What are your performance goals?

[/ QUOTE ]

Im looking for a reliable street worthy motor to go low 11's. Want it to look somewhat stock using a ZL-1 block and 074 heads, headers, 198/163 intake. I fugure more displacement will yield more torque which would help my somewhat heavy 69 Chevelle 3800/3900 lbs. All I have is the block and heads..If I have to buy a crank kit..bigger is better..right??

ALbert

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2009, 10:36 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: motor size

If you're wanting a stock-ish 4150 flange you might also look at the GM 359 intake that all the S/S L78/L72 guys are running...there's a little bit of extra HP there out of the box, and you'd be starting with a nice, new part. Also, if you're stuck on the original ZL1 block I'd at least Ebay the 074s and buy a set of oval port Race Rites or AFRs (or another aluminum head of your choice)...the newer heads will ease your mind in regards to pulling studs/guides/dropping seats and whatever else plagues those old aluminum heads, and you'll be ahead of the game performance-wise. And, an iron headed bbc/400thm combo can get down to 3500lbs pretty easily [minus driver] so the aluminum engine is gonna chop another 150lbs or so off the nose [where it's most important]...you'll add a little bit back with a bigger bottom end, but not enough to sweat it.

You're biggest challenge is gonna be getting it off the line...ask me how I know...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.