Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy
That 2nd and 3rd page of McNeish report sums up some suspicions.
Things that I see that raise questions
NCRS says car was built 4-1-69, but rear is dated 3-31?
POP - is it a repop? McNeish questions it. Says dealer stamp is not legit
In the handwritten notes pic 330 - Aug 3, 2003 - new shortblock rebuilt? So is the really the born with engine?
That dealer invoice looks too fresh and made up, MacNeish questions it also.
Was POP made up to match the current drive line? I like the Trans stamp. Engine pad stamp but not sure about the VIN stamp on the engine. I question the 3/31 rear (no stamping pic) in a 4/1 built car.
Kurt S is the expert on POPs
If the POP is in question by McNeish, then you got to wonder. The other docs are suspect.
|
So because the rear was built on 3/31, does that mean the rear was built too late for a 4/1 built car?
In other words, should the rear have been already built weeks before 4/1? 
__________________
Dave Dykstra
1968 Camaro Palomino Ivory/Ivy Gold interior
-Delivered to Courtesy Chevrolet, Los Angeles, CA
2013 Corvette Grand Sport 60th Anniversary Edition
Arctic White/Diamond Blue interior
-Delivered to Bill Jacobs Chevrolet, Joliet, IL
NCRS#66003
Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that’s what gets
you. – Jeremy Clarkson.
Dykstra Motorsports
|