That 2nd and 3rd page of McNeish report sums up some suspicions.
Things that I see that raise questions
NCRS says car was built 4-1-69, but rear is dated 3-31?
POP - is it a repop? McNeish questions it. Says dealer stamp is not legit
In the handwritten notes pic 330 - Aug 3, 2003 - new shortblock rebuilt? So is the really the born with engine?
That dealer invoice looks too fresh and made up, MacNeish questions it also.
Was POP made up to match the current drive line? I like the Trans stamp. Engine pad stamp but not sure about the VIN stamp on the engine. I question the 3/31 rear (no stamping pic) in a 4/1 built car.
Kurt S is the expert on POPs
If the POP is in question by McNeish, then you got to wonder. The other docs are suspect.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise
1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise
1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed
1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion
1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner
|