Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-14-2016, 11:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: scuncio kid</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance </div></div>
Uh..................no [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/thumbsdown.gif[/img] 
|
|
#2
02-14-2016, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Caricature stance of the 70's looks like crap.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: scuncio kid</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance </div></div>
|
|
#3
02-14-2016, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: scuncio kid</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance</div></div>
Purple People eatin' stink bug??
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know!
|
|
#4
02-14-2016, 01:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
That '67 Camaro is just amazing. Was it repainted?
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car - Sold  On The Lookout For My Next Classic... John 10:30
|
|
#6
02-14-2016, 07:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: DW31S</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Love the Gold '67 Camaro.......the newer style Cragars? Not so much. </div></div>
Likewise... my only gripe about the car
__________________
Follow me on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mbcgarage/
|
|
#7
02-14-2016, 07:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
I don't understand that. They're 95% identical to the old ones. To tell the truth, I can't even tell the difference.
__________________
My cars, passed down by my grandfather: '68 Camaro SS (454/TH400, possible L78/M22) LeMans Blue, black deluxe interior, black vinyl top. 3.73- mostly Day 2. '89 Mustang GT- 3.55, subframe connectors, muffler delete, and a couple other minor mods. Exactly as he wanted it, so how it shall stay Also: 1995 Ford F-150 XL 2004 Dodge Ram Hemi GTX- #192 of 433 Ain't no fun in viewing your car as an 'investment'. Get out there and beat on it!
|
|
#8
02-15-2016, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JRC99</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't understand that. They're 95% identical to the old ones. To tell the truth, I can't even tell the difference. </div></div>
Not even close to the old ones. The new Cragars look like Cragar impostors back in the day.
|
|
#9
02-14-2016, 09:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
I think the spokes are flatter ... right?
__________________
You've never lived until you've almost died -- for those who fight for it, life has a flavor the protected will never know!
|
|
#10
02-14-2016, 09:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: earntaz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think the spokes are flatter ... right? </div></div>
Yes and it is noticable, and it matters to some.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
