![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone know if the shifter boot and plate is correct in pic #7 ????? It's always been a non console car, even back in the 80's it didn't have a console. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, from the picture they look right. I'd have to see them in person to determine if they're original. Both are available in repop now. You might want to unscrew the black and chrome top plate and flip it over. Originals have a cast-in part number, Repops don't. Hope that helps.
__________________
Craig S. "I saw Elvis At 1000 Feet" John Force. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although many will disagree, I'am sticking by my origianl statement:.....Without the factory motor/tranns its no longer a 68 Z28.
Got my bullet proof vest on guys......shoot me! [/ QUOTE ] won't shoot you, just disagree with that, lets say someone has a X33 69 car and it also has a 327 engine, you're statement means that this car isn't a Z28 anymore just a modified 69 Camaro or how about a legit copo car with a 454 instead of an original 427??? same difference. In your defense I can relate to your feelings on people trying to pass fake cars as legitimate cars and rest assured this isn't the case at all. I felt like this was a good site to get an honest opinion on the car which is what I'm getting good or bad. What about all the cars with re-stamped engines??? Would you not rather see a car with an advertised 327 than someone claiming to have a "302" only to learn 3 years later it's not??? I'm assuming your car is a numbers car but what if----- it was stamped before you bought the car??? Either way I'm thick skinned so no biggie just enjoying the input
__________________
1968 Z-28 1969 X-77 original 1971 RS 17's-hotchkis-406/6spd 1998 SS 6spd |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can you post a picture of the trim tag? Also how about a picture of the 4 piston calipers and 2 piece rotors. The master cylinder is wrong so that doesn't help.
Alternator doesn't have the deep groove pulley so that's not correct. How about a picture or posting of the radiator tag? What timing decal is on the core support? I would like to see something a little more convincing besides pictures of a nice Blue 1968 Camaro non original motor SB 4 speed car with white stripes. Rick H. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll be more than happy to post the pics but I've promised the family a trip to Gatlinburg this weekend( even invited my mother in law to smooth this car thing over).
On a little different note, a lot of people got of track with this post. I'm not trying to convince you guys it's a real car, I know it's the real deal and I'm going to enjoy the car even if it was a 6 cyl. I was curious what it was worth and have enjoyed all the input over the last few days. Sure it would be cool to find the build sheet, pop, anything to validate the car and without anything it's almost if not impossible to prove anything on a 1968. Every item to validate the car that was just mentioned can be bought today even though there are select few that can tell the difference but not many in some cases. Don't hold your breath until I post up and say "LOOKIE WHAT I FOUND,THE POP IMAGINE THAT" I'm only interested in preserving a little piece of my past and have fun doing so. Who knows what will become available in the future only time will tell??? I wonder if Central Chevrolet in Clombia has kept any records that old?? I'll call and see, I doubt they did.
__________________
1968 Z-28 1969 X-77 original 1971 RS 17's-hotchkis-406/6spd 1998 SS 6spd |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As someone who just paid "too much" for a car just because they wanted it sooo bad because it was just like their first cool car, I completely understand where your coming from and I'd say from your story alone you did good
![]() Believe me, if you get half the enjoyment I've had just looking at my car you won't regret buying it one bit. Congrats and good luck with your new toy ![]()
__________________
Tom <font color="#00FF00">1970 Z/28</font> |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]() [/ QUOTE ] won't shoot you, just disagree with that, lets say someone has a X33 69 car and it also has a 327 engine, you're statement means that this car isn't a Z28 anymore just a modified 69 Camaro [/ QUOTE ] The heart and soul of any first generation Z28 is the original high RPM 302. Without it, its just another modified Camaro. Not trying to be ugly here, but I prefer my F-Bodies with the factory drivetain intact. Reckon I've become a purist but I do enjoy nice modified cars. I'am no expert, but I've been messin' with Camaros for over 35 years. I'am happy to say that my Van Nuys car is not a restamp. If you like your 68, enjoy it!
__________________
Craig S. "I saw Elvis At 1000 Feet" John Force. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your post is titled "1968 Z-28 what's it worth???? please help"
In order to determine what it might be worth, first you must determine if it is in fact a true 1968 Z/28. There is a HUGE difference in value between a legit Z/28 and a plain Camaro. You could be talking between $50-$100K difference. That's big. I'll be honest, I just don't see the validity of the car with what has been posted so far. Enjoy your car, it's a nice looking Camaro and looks like fun. Rick H. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I haven't read the whole thread, but if it has the orig.rear end: Bv Bu or better, a long with the 4 leaf springs, it's more likely a Z than not.I'll bet $50 this car has a single 3/8 fuel line going into the tank and the muncie speedo exit.
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
$50 to 100K? Does anyone know of a '68 Z that's actually sold for $50K or more, other than the ragtop or an SCCA race car? Where is the market right now for a mid 90's restored (mostly NOS parts) #2 condition car with full original drivetrain and POP/dealer invoice? A friend of mine is thinking of buying back a car he restored and asked me for advice on market prices. Thanks.
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I haven't read the whole thread, but if it has the orig.rear end: Bv Bu or better, a long with the 4 leaf springs, it's more likely a Z than not.I'll bet $50 this car has a single 3/8 fuel line going into the tank and the muncie speedo exit. [/ QUOTE ] If some one will pm me and tell what to look at I'll check. It does have 4 leafs per side and shouldn't the cable exit closer to the center of the firewall if a Muncie car?? It will be 1st of the week before I can post anymore pics. If there are any super top secret things to check send me a PM rather than post on here to prevent more fake cars from being built.
__________________
1968 Z-28 1969 X-77 original 1971 RS 17's-hotchkis-406/6spd 1998 SS 6spd |
![]() |
|
|