Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-12-2005, 06:38 AM
hvychev hvychev is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

Man Dave I hope they can redo that paint cause it's

How does the car sound with that motor and the side pipes?
__________________
Frank Magallon
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-12-2005, 08:29 AM
55chevy 55chevy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 2,320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to 55chevy Send a message via AIM to 55chevy Send a message via Yahoo to 55chevy
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

[ QUOTE ]
LOL!

Don't tempt me! It has taken me everything that I got to not day 2 my car!

[/ QUOTE ]

Frank... It's yours... Day 2 it man.... Day 2 it!!
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-12-2005, 01:42 PM
DirtyS DirtyS is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wisconsin Dells
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

[ QUOTE ]
Here's a photo of an edelbrock tr/(2) 600cfm carbs-str. linkage----From that Motion car---maybe this will help--Just some info

[/ QUOTE ]

If that is a Motion car it really makes me question some of the mystique and values floated around for them.

Looks like something the typical backyard guy would do with some rubber fuel line.

Not impressed.
__________________
1970 W30 Holiday hardtop
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-12-2005, 06:01 PM
whitetop whitetop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,201
Thanks: 17
Thanked 370 Times in 137 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

[ QUOTE ]
If that is a Motion car it really makes me question some of the mystique and values floated around for them.

Looks like something the typical backyard guy would do with some rubber fuel line.

Not impressed

[/ QUOTE ]


Part of that is it was the '70's and the detail was not as big a concern as today. Also you did not have all the hi-tech billet do-dadds and plumbing back then, you had to fabricate your own. Also to be honest Motion was not known for their neatness. I saw one pic and they added traction bars and spray painted them after instalation and had overspray all over the rearend and gas tank. On the V-8 Vega 454 that Motion did they just took a sledghammer and beat back the firewall. I think a dealership car built today along those lines would have had a custom firewall built IMHO because we have higher standards.

BTW, my mustang TR had a Moroso y-block mounted on a custom stainless steel mounting bracket. Looked much better than Motions setup but I have seen worse than Motions setups in old pics.

In regards to the rubber lines that is what people ran back then. Only the top fuelers and f/c's ran stainless steel braided lines. I started to see SSBL really taking off on street cars starting in the the mid '70's.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-12-2005, 06:04 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,902
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,500 Times in 1,421 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

Those were some primitive days & crude techniques.
Both at the speedshop AND Factory back then.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-12-2005, 06:26 PM
rat tuned rat tuned is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: lakeville ma
Posts: 146
Thanks: 17
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

we have built 2 tunnel ram street cars. car 1 was a 68 firebird with a 400" chevy 10.8-1 comp with AFR heads and a comp 294S sam. 10" converter and 3.73 gears. used a weiand street ram with 2 rebuilt 450 mechanical holleys. all we did was drop the power valves lower because of a lack of vacuum because of cam. this car ran awesome and was wicked responsive even with the automatic. never got it to the track because a professional football plater saw it in front of the garage and bought it. car was an absolute blast the short time we had it.
second car was a 68 camaro with a 9-1 454 and LS-6 mechanical cam. 4-speed and 3.73 gears. same weiand street tunnel ram but 600 vacuum carbs. car was pretty mismatched but ran real good for what it was. we ended putting screws in the secondary linkage and it seemed to help but was NOT the way to do this. car looked tough and was a blast to drive. mike
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-12-2005, 07:01 PM
JoeG JoeG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Brooklyn, N.Y.
Posts: 3,265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question



If that is a Motion car it really makes me question some of the mystique and values floated around for them.

Looks like something the typical backyard guy would do with some rubber fuel line.

Not impressed.

[/ QUOTE ]

The photo wasn't really meant to impress anyone Dirty, it was just shown as a reference to a TR setup---Those rubber fuel lines are industry approved gas lines that would have been used in a line splice especially were vibration and stress were a factor-----A lot of Motion photos weren't staged ie guys in white coveralls installing engines with scrubbed clean equipment--the photos were taken as the work was being done--that's what I always thought was so about those old photos of speed shops --Anyway, I'm not here to defend anyones table manners or lack of but you should be impressed by Motion and other HI-PO shops that built cars that set records and ruled the streets in a time were grease under your fingernails was just part of the job-------------
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-12-2005, 09:20 PM
55chevy 55chevy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 2,320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to 55chevy Send a message via AIM to 55chevy Send a message via Yahoo to 55chevy
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here's a photo of an edelbrock tr/(2) 600cfm carbs-str. linkage----From that Motion car---maybe this will help--Just some info

[/ QUOTE ]

If that is a Motion car it really makes me question some of the mystique and values floated around for them.

Looks like something the typical backyard guy would do with some rubber fuel line.

Not impressed.

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't need to look pretty to go FAST!
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-14-2005, 07:53 AM
RichSchmidt RichSchmidt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 620
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

That was pretty much standard fare back in the 70's.I had the article of Grumpy Jenkin's 70 camaro prostocker from the 1970 issue of Hot Rod,and it mentions how the car was plumbed with"Neoprine" hose,as if this was some kind of state of the art feature at the time.The trick record holding prostock fuel system consisted of some 5/8" metal home heating tubes soldered into the top of the tank with rubber hoses running to 2 Carter fuel pumps,the same kind you could buy for $9 at the local parts store at the time,and the engine compartment fuel lines were all done with hardware store grade brass fittings and rubber hose.This was state of the art back then.This could also be why the Grumps Monza burned to the ground so fast a few years later,but the fancy fuel systems we know today wouldnt be around for years to come.

The real tuth about most supercars was way too sugar coated.Most of these highly valued supercars had sledge hammer adjustments done to fit oversized tires,and exhaust systems,and you have to remember that these super valueable Motion supercars were about as pleasant to drive on the street every day as having a prostock race car with mufflers.That is what made them so valuable,the race car mystique.In reality,they were hard to drive tempermantal beasts that were broken down more then they were running,or at least that was the case of you actually drove yours the way they were intended to be driven.Most of them were either found burned alongside the road because their owners grew tired of their beastly ways,or were converted to full on race cars and evolved off the streets.Thats just how it was.The fact was that the Motion car wasnt anything that the average kid couldnt have built for half the price at the time in his back yard with hand tools.In reality, even the winningest of prostock cars from that era would be nothing more then a bunch of cobbled together parts that wouldnt pass saftey inspection at even the most backwoods track in rebel country today.Back then,they were record hold state of the art race cars.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-14-2005, 07:59 AM
hvychev hvychev is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: old school tunnel ram and carbs question

Hmmmmm.....very well said IMO.
__________________
Frank Magallon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.