Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-10-2008, 07:51 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,908
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,515 Times in 1,425 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

None that I know of.
Lets be clear we're talking FACTORY assembled cars here,not Dealer or OTC installed.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-10-2008, 08:07 PM
SS427's Avatar
SS427 SS427 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pleasant Plains, IL
Posts: 10,313
Thanks: 3,091
Thanked 4,483 Times in 1,129 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

Recently Ive had numerous conversations with Fran Preve of the Tonawanda engine foundry regarding just this subject. He to this day still holds the plant production records from that era.

According to Fran and I quote "The Tonawanda engine plant kept VERY accurate records on engines built during each model year. These "Summeries of Engines Built" list EVERY engine we built by assembly number and description. This number crossed over to a suffix code so from them I could determine how many of each SUFFIX CODE we built. Sometimes, as in the case of the L-89 engines built, I had further records. In these cases it was "engine canceled, not replaced" and then a date.

In the case of the L-89 engines in 1970, in October 1969 the L-89 option was canceled, not replaced. there were (off hand) 18 L78/L89 engines built before the option was canceled. As far as the LS6/L89 NONE WERE BUILT. Period. In model year 1970 NO aluminum head LS6 engines were built. In 1971 there were 200 LS6 engines built and put into Corvettes, ALL were aluminum head (due to the lowered compression ratio).

I've spent many years researching big block production (ALL big blocks). I'm always open to new information, DOCUMENTED AND IRRIFUTABLE. But if anyone wants to contradict me they'd better have better records than I do!"

I trust Fran knows what he is talking about and has investigated all his documents from Tonawanda.
__________________
Rick Nelson
Musclecar Restoration and Design, Inc (retired)
www.musclecarrestorationanddesign.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62r-6vgk2_8
specialized in (only real) LS6 Chevelle restorations
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:52 AM
Schonyenko2 Schonyenko2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Donahue, Ia. USA
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 93
Thanked 100 Times in 55 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

[ QUOTE ]
"Not to change the subject, but I seem to recall an LS-6 conv. with aluminum heads that had the build sheet."

That LS-6 Chevelle Convertible was just that,and not an LS-6/L-89.
Bill Clement at ChevyCraft in Tex. was the one who owned it and made that claim at that time.The paperwork was doctored to reflect the Al. Head option,and soon disproven.
That car was orginally sold here new at Dick Wickstrom Chevrolet in Roselle,Il.back during 1970.
I don't believe any 1970 LS-6 Chevelle was assembled w/L-89 Al.Heads from the factory.

[/ QUOTE ]

The article I read was from years ago on the LS6 842 chevelles. They claimed at the time there may have been 3 I believe. The article talked about how Chevrolet had an issue with doing it as the LS6 was a new motor using old 842 head design.
Now perhaps It's the same car that Rick P. mentions as having bogused docs. But the main subject matter of it all delt with unusually optioned cars not just L89 options. Options like liquid tire chain, optic fibre, etc. Seemed like it was a Super Chevy(not always the last word in absolutes.)
If Rick N. says he believes there are none until proven so, I would agree with him.
As far as novas again, they present a different problem in authenticating as there is no specific suffix code for an L89 application as there is for Camaros, Chevelles, or Corvettes. That's why if there ever were any, you would need verifiable paperwork, or a credible original owner.I understand that it sucks that original owners sometimes get "encouragement money" to remember things that weren't, or bogused docs. But unless you want to pay big money for something that isn't you'll need to be very careful.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-11-2008, 01:13 AM
mockingbird812's Avatar
mockingbird812 mockingbird812 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton
Posts: 14,412
Thanks: 910
Thanked 802 Times in 485 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

I have the article on the "LS6 w/ Aluminum Heads" at home and will post it tonight.
__________________
Sam...

Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-11-2008, 01:20 AM
92646 92646 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orange county Ca.
Posts: 1,406
Thanks: 3
Thanked 33 Times in 21 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

Why did they still use closed chamber heads in 1970? The open chamber heads had been around for awhile. It made more power and got better results with the smog regulations. In 1971 did they use an open chamber head with a closed chamber piston to lower the compression?
Mark Sheppard
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-11-2008, 02:43 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

[ QUOTE ]
Why did they still use closed chamber heads in 1970? The open chamber heads had been around for awhile. It made more power and got better results with the smog regulations. In 1971 did they use an open chamber head with a closed chamber piston to lower the compression?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure it necessarily made more power apples-apples...today's Pro Stock engines aren't open chambered, quite the opposite...tiny, tiny chambers with a huge quench area. With an open chamber, to get any kind of compression you're talking a BIG dome, which means more weight in the piston, which means a heavier pin, which means a heavier rod, which means a heavier counterweight...that's a lot of *heavier* components, and these engines were already struggling with rods/bolts living as it was. Anyway, that's enough rambling from me...

IIRC, the 074s (L88, ZL1, '71 LS6) I believe were the only open chamber production BBC stuff...top shelf stuff indeed, but old technology as well.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-11-2008, 03:26 AM
m22mike's Avatar
m22mike m22mike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West of CAK
Posts: 5,001
Thanks: 766
Thanked 840 Times in 406 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

[ QUOTE ]
I have never seen any doc's on either car. Show me the doc's. As I have said before of the Gibb 50 nova's we have found 20+ But there is 311 alm. head nova's there should at least 100 of them found by now. JMO

[/ QUOTE ]

Since we are on the subject about L89 heads, has anybody ever questioned this 311 # for L89 cars made?
311 Camaros, 311 Chevelles...etc...

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-11-2008, 05:44 AM
al8apex al8apex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,993
Thanks: 25
Thanked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

[ QUOTE ]
"Not to change the subject, but I seem to recall an LS-6 conv. with aluminum heads that had the build sheet."

That LS-6 Chevelle Convertible was just that,and not an LS-6/L-89.
Bill Clement at ChevyCraft in Tex. was the one who owned it and made that claim at that time.The paperwork was doctored to reflect the Al. Head option,and soon disproven.
That car was orginally sold here new at Dick Wickstrom Chevrolet in Roselle,Il.back during 1970.
I don't believe any 1970 LS-6 Chevelle was assembled w/L-89 Al.Heads from the factory.

[/ QUOTE ]

I remember that car going through the B-J auction with the heads in the trunk some years ago. I heard that person did a lot of doctoring ... on lots of things
__________________
Jim R
Scottsdale, AZ

Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-11-2008, 06:12 AM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

[ QUOTE ]
Since we are on the subject about L89 heads, has anybody ever questioned this 311 # for L89 cars made?
311 Camaros, 311 Chevelles...etc...

Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

I always thought that was a mix up since both cars shared the same engine codes. I can't imagine they made exactly 311 of each.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-11-2008, 08:07 AM
mockingbird812's Avatar
mockingbird812 mockingbird812 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton
Posts: 14,412
Thanks: 910
Thanked 802 Times in 485 Posts
Default Re: L89 Nova???????

Chevy High Performance, August 1995...


__________________
Sam...

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.