Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-14-2002, 05:39 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

Great post [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2002, 07:11 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

Obviously this discussion is looking for opinions on how people perceive these cars and their restorations. I'll say that in my opinion, there is a difference between a rebody and replacing welded metal like quarter panels. If you damaged your car back in 69, the dealer would replace the damaged panel and repaint the area to match. That has been an accepted practice for a long time. If you damaged the entire body, the car was totalled, you weren't given a new body to put all other parts on. Saving a rusted out or severly damaged body on a rare car is a difficult and expensive task and it helps preserve the history of these cars. We all know there are people doing rebodies and back-halving cars so they can make a buck. I won't buy one of these cars and I'm sure most of the people here wouldn't either. But I see no problem with replacing rusted or damaged panels or body parts. It's no different than replacing other maintenance items like radiator hoses, spark plug wires. But the way I see it, the body shell is the actual car that the VIN and title go with. I sure wish we could get some more people to add their thoughts to this discussion. I don't expect everyone to agree, but it always helps to hear other thoughts.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2002, 02:02 AM
Leonard Leonard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newark, Ohio USA
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

Original vs Correct? ..take a valuable car such as a 69 ZL-1 or Yenko Camaro. Its a basket case. If This car is going to be restored, it is no longer original. So, we must restore it to be correct. With restoration cost not being an issue, how should we do this restoration? A) a complete body panel replacement restoration except firewall using GM panels (not installed or assembled at the GM assy line) or B) a re-body (a 69 rust free body assembled by GM at the assy line). As for the donor car for the re-body, it was a assigned a VIN and body # also. IMO the VIN and Body # is not exclusive to the body they are applied to. As far as the COPO being restored, the body is not a 1 of 1 built for that drive train. What if.. Don Yenko submitted his order for the first 50 COPO's 2 weeks later. Would these cars have the same VIN and body #s ? I am not for or against a rebody being acceptable. I am stating my opinion on what i would be comfortable with if i should purchace a car that i knew had went thru a complete body restoration. I would much rather have a re-body. I feel it would be more correct. Just my opinion.
__________________
Leonard Blevins
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2002, 01:36 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

Anyone who has come from the street rod building world into the muscle car world wouldn't think twice about rebodying a car. This business has been going on forever without a second thought where they come from. The rebody in itself added little to the value of the car other than the fact that you would have solid metal to work with. In the muscle car world different things matter and different rules apply. Specific models, engine options etc are a couple of examples of what can add greatly to the value of the car. It might just take some time and a few court dates before these guys learn the new rules.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2002, 11:52 PM
BARRY BARRY is offline
Yenko Advertising Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: ACTON ONT CANADA
Posts: 1,298
Thanks: 8
Thanked 71 Times in 39 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

IT IS JUST A NUMBER YOU ARE JUST A NUMBER IF YOU WANT TO FIND THAT OUT JUST PHONE THE GOVERMENT IF YOU HAVE A NICE CAR AND YOUR NOT TRYING TO RIP SOME BODY OFF FOR A LOT OF MONEY I HAVE BEEN THIER IT COST ME A LOT JUST CLEAR MY NAME I WAS SOLD A CAR I DID NOT CHECK OUT THE DEAL WAS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE I SHOUD HAVE KNOWN BETTER
__________________
Barry Allan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2003, 04:13 AM
jus4funn68 jus4funn68 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 97
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

I was just wondering just how many of us actually KNOW the total history of the cars we own? How would some of us feel if we found out that the pristine Z-28 had actually been in a fender bender because someone loanded the car to his sister one night and the front fender was replaced??? It would be something that would humble the best of us I would think.
__________________
--------------------------------------------------
68SS Camaro L-78
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-31-2003, 02:08 AM
rlesser rlesser is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

neet topic, I do change body panels and bodies for a living!
I have either owned a bodyshop or worked in one for the last
25-30 yrs-mostly european stuff, domestic for fun! I can buy a new body from porsche, complete fenders and all. We have talked customers into doing this based on. putting ourselves in a position of the next collision!safety! we take incredible pride in our skills-but-we can't duplicate a
factory weld from porsche or mercedes! period! is ours stronger or weaker? Yes there are procedures but we don't crash test our work-do we....the idea of replacing the body on the car when done ethically/not changing options or modifying the vin is legal and is being done on a day to day schedule. Is it o.k. to change the body on your #s matching car. All i know is i wouldn't be caught dead in a
car that has had 1000's of factory welds replaced vs a rebody.(no body like a factory body). when did the z-28 going down the assembly line get its soul/i.d./etc.?
when the engine and trans went in or when the dealer ordered
the car? How was the body of the 6cyl car different from the z-28? its not-the legal document is the true value, and to car collectors, buyer beware. hire a professional to view the car, do your research, and have fun with these things.

rob
67 gto conv.
68 firebird 400
68 daytona ss chevelle
70 grand prix sj HO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2003, 03:24 AM
MotownMadman MotownMadman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

Rob, it wouldnt bother you if you found out your GTO body was actually a 326 Lemans body that someone had removed all the VIN numbers and GTO related parts and placed them on it?
Motown [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
"What Kind Of Bird Dont Fly?......."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2003, 05:02 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,981
Thanks: 495
Thanked 4,775 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default Re: Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

69RSSS350.... Are you really trying to say that anybody not voicing their opinion on this subject is into Rebodies ? I am sure that is what you are trying to Imply. That is one of the Dumber comments I have heard on this Board. You seem to consistently have a habit of insulting People and then saying that is not what you meant.
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.