Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-06-2002, 08:32 PM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,713
Thanks: 421
Thanked 2,335 Times in 600 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

The reason I say Chevy lost money on the COPO cars is because of the engineering costs. Engineering costs are very high but when divided over 500,000 cars it is not that much per unit. With only about 1000 hi po COPO cars built in 1969 there was no economy of scale.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-06-2002, 10:32 PM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

There's still no substitute for cubic inches..plus I only weigh 160 lbs. so I still have the edge ! Plus Mr 70 is from the south side...they never figured out how to drive down there.

[Edited by Belair62 (01-06-2002 at 05:32 PM).]
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-07-2002, 01:30 AM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

I have personally felt the power of the iron 427 and the ZL-1 in a Camaro. I guess the car that really impressed me the most in the last couple of years was the 68 NOVA that won the MCR stock appearing shootouts. This car should leave no doubt concerning the performance potential of a properly tuned 396 car.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-07-2002, 01:33 AM
COPO PETE COPO PETE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Glencoe, Ont. Canada.
Posts: 1,382
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

.....if it is a 396 car!
Peter
__________________
Pete Simpson 1962-2013 RIP
Owen Simpson
Eric Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-07-2002, 09:34 AM
JoeC JoeC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: ri
Posts: 3,713
Thanks: 421
Thanked 2,335 Times in 600 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

The 1969 L78 and the L72 were very similar engines and shared many parts. From memory I believe the crank, cam, 840 heads, Holley, dist, intake and exhaust manifolds were the same part numbers. The L72 just had 31 more cu in. Chevy originally rated it at 450hp then reduced it to 425hp with no modifications.

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-07-2002, 12:11 PM
9566 BA's Avatar
9566 BA 9566 BA is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 696
Thanks: 11
Thanked 72 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

What about the 69 SS 396 Orange post car with a L-89 that's in Floyd Garretts museum. I am told there was only 6 of those made. Would it bring COPO money.

[Edited by 9566 BA (01-07-2002 at 07:11 AM).]
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-07-2002, 07:08 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

COPO is a magic name,this name open many doors, L89 is just and addon,
and COPO 427-425 HP is comparable with a Mopar Hemi 426-425 HP
Chevelle SS396(375 HP) is not comparable with a B Body Mopar Hemi.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-07-2002, 08:09 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

In STOCK trim, the 2 engines are probably close to 1hp per cubic inch, which gives the edge to the L-72, by about 30hp. The weight savings of the L-89 is probably around 150(?) pounds. I would rather have the 30hp .

And like Pete said, the 396 Nova that was mentioned earlier probably shouldn't be used as a reference...I'm thinking it's not quite stock.

[Edited by Chevy454 (01-07-2002 at 03:09 PM).]
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-04-2013, 01:26 AM
Ryan1969Chevelle's Avatar
Ryan1969Chevelle Ryan1969Chevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Beautiful Elora Ontario Canada
Posts: 5,958
Thanks: 578
Thanked 872 Times in 458 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

Hi all,

I don't know if this is cool but I am posting to bring this old Topic back to the active posts.

Great stuff in here, right up my alley.

IMHO I am with MR70 and Mickey Hale, L89 is damn sexy, and win or lose I would love to chase down a COPO with one some day.

Ryan





__________________


1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold
1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold
1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-04-2013, 02:02 AM
Postsedan Postsedan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 12,342
Thanks: 6
Thanked 993 Times in 618 Posts
Default Re: Higher value 69 Chevelle COPO 427 or L-78/L89?

Ryan,

Trust me, You&quot;ll never catch a COPO Chevelle with an L89 Chevelle. Two different animals.

I am a huge fan of both. But, if someone said you had to pick one..... I would choose a COPO Chevelle all day.

Dan
__________________
69 300 Deluxe Post Sedan Frost Green
69 SS396 300 Deluxe Post Sedan Lemans Blue SOLD
70 Buick Skylark Post Sedan Gulfstream Blue
70 Buick Skylark Post Sedan Burnished Saddle

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PM3DE8qI2NY

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn4xEmGypUw
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.