![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To go back to this, I suspected it was related to emissions too. But I've never found any 1970 rule change that being over 400 cu in would help. And .030 wouldn't affect emissions enough either.
But for some reason, they made the change. And it got really confusing cause they called it a 396, but it was a 402. But all the service docs called it a 400 - and there was also the SB 400. Reading service docs can be like a replay of 'who's on first...'
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This might be what the dealer was talking about. Here is some 1970 Model Year Info. It does mention the 1969 Camaro 396 as it relates to the 402 introduced in 1970. See page 7.
1970 New Model Summary And information on the 402 Mark IV Block 400 Cu. In. Engine Released However would not apply to an earlier 1969. That would have probably be a green block issue. Greg
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org |
![]() |
|
|