Royal Plum 67 Camaro L78 on ebay

[plumL78]

If you take some time and look at some of the real trim tags on Ebay you will notice a difference in the size of the letters on the top and bottom of the tag. Also you can look at the way the t's are between the o's in MOTOR and between the A and I in CORPORATION, they look very different. Then if you go to this site http://www.trimtags.com/ and look at the 67 camaro trim tag you will see someting very familiar to the tag on this (L78 camaro) tag

[AMANOCC]

Whats with the radio delete, it looks like the aluminum panel that covers the radio/heater never had a hole in it??

[supercomp 8.90]

the tag really looks to be fake, heres a picture of my 67 396 tag for a car i just sold.

[budnate]

[ QUOTE ]
hi early build date i am not sure camaro resource group said possibly one of the first of the big block cars,i dont know for sure i got the car from a friend of mine that died 20 years ago.all the engine trans and rear end was in the car when i got it the car sat in storage and not touched for over 20 years.have trans code #p7s177 rear code is QL0222g1 tag was on it tag was same as it had when i got it

[/ QUOTE ] from owner selling car.

here ya go..I replied back asking for some pics of the rear... we have been proved wrong before..could be something...were tags available 20+ years ago???

My Calvin book does not show that QL code for 67..am I still asleep...

[Jeff H]

Rear is dated too late for the car based on the 11C on the trim tag. I thought the earliest L78 cars had the 4P on the trim tag and that was in the April time frame. I don't see any way this car is an L78 and that tag is probably a fake.

[Seattle Sam]

Bud,
QL is 3.31 open 12-bolt.

[Kurt S]

I requested him to cease and desist in using the CRG's name. His statement is not true, CRG never stated any such thing.

Bud,
http://www.camaros.org/radiusrod.shtml