Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-07-2003, 03:57 AM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

If it is that rusty, you will probably have almost 3,000 in materials not including the sheetmetal you would need. Nice project, nice car! Worth the money... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] Sam
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-07-2003, 03:40 PM
68TopStock 68TopStock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Paul, MN, USA
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Sounds like a great project, don't expect to get it on the cheap, however. These cars are now at the same price the COPO's were at just 3 years ago. Probably will appreciate more as less COPO's are available in project form. You must save the body, especially with an original drivetrain. Do whatever it takes, and if possible, use an original floor.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-07-2003, 04:47 PM
Zedder's Avatar
Zedder Zedder is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: 100
Thanked 639 Times in 352 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Just for fun, let's hear what some of you think it is worth? RS, good color, am radio, no other options, running, body shot - needs everything!
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-07-2003, 05:07 PM
BillD BillD is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 129
Thanked 69 Times in 40 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Mark:

If the new guy can put his 2 cents in, this should be a two part question. The second question should be, what do you think it would cost to fix this thing right? Even with a 67 Z I think you would have more money into it than it would be worth when it was done. Again this means doing the car correctly with original parts whenever they can be found.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-07-2003, 05:14 PM
Zedder's Avatar
Zedder Zedder is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: 100
Thanked 639 Times in 352 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Bill: I'd say $40K minimum and more than likely $50K to restore it.
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-07-2003, 06:40 PM
BillD BillD is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,059
Thanks: 129
Thanked 69 Times in 40 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Mark:

My guess would have been in the same area $45-50000. And that's with me doing disassembly and reassembly and paying someone to do body, paint, machine and other specialized services. The scary thing is I am usually way low on my estimates.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-07-2003, 07:02 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Knowing the cost to restore it properly, that would probably put the value of the car as it sits around $15-25K IMO. The RS adds value along with a good color.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-07-2003, 10:10 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

Jeff, Do you really think that car in that condition is worth 15-25 thousand? I know the car is rare and desirable but I was thinking (not seeing it) around 10-15 thousand. Even if Frank Arone and Brian Henderson do that car I would be surprised if you could get $50.000 for it.I am sure you will have that into it if it is done right. I feel the 67 Z is well underated but the 69's with millions of them out there is still the first choice by most. I really like the interiors of the 1967 camaros and the location of their gauges. He just has to look at it as a long term investment and really just do it for himself. I would use all original sheetmetal, (I did my 1969 Z with original west coast sheetmetal and it looks very good). I am not really crazy about NOS unless it is from vey early 70's. Original virgin sheetmetal really does fit better. Just my opinion. Sam [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2003, 10:25 PM
MotownMadman MotownMadman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,380
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

I would agree for the most part with Jeff at 15-20K. The 67 Z is starting to come into the scheme of things in this hobby as I see more people looking for them. On the high end at the moment I am representing a high quality example at 100K.
Motown [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img]
__________________
"What Kind Of Bird Dont Fly?......."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2003, 10:29 PM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: Rust versus Original Drivetrain

That is good to hear. I like to see the Z/28's get some respect. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] sam
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.