Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-22-2001, 01:48 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

Kind of an odd car. Clill,the color isn't THAT bad.......almost looks like the color of your 68 L-78 Chevelle which is now in my area..By the way it's real close to me somewhere. I went to a cruise at a local hot dog joint and in it came. That was one sharp car.
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-22-2001, 04:48 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,969
Thanks: 485
Thanked 4,715 Times in 1,210 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

It looks better in the pic than in real life. Imron has a Thick look to it.
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-22-2001, 06:50 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,077
Thanks: 2
Thanked 764 Times in 359 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

It was a deal at $11,500. Esp with that engine and trans and those seats. Not a deal at what they want for it.

__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-22-2001, 07:27 PM
Fhakya Fhakya is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Mankato, MN, USA
Posts: 522
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

I'm not a big fan of the 75-81's but that looks like it would be a fun car...especially w/ that engine. Also, the relative scarcity would makes it an interesting piece IMHO.
-Mark Holman
__________________
-=Mark Holman=-
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-23-2001, 04:01 PM
bowtie3168 bowtie3168 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincroft, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

It is funny how topics of conversation come back up at interesting times. I posted this one back in January and I had actually forgotten about it. I met a gentleman the other night at the home of a friend who allows me to store my wrecked '81 Z28 (non Yenko) at her house. Here is the funny part: he told me that he wants to restore his mother's '81 Z28 that she bought new with a dealer installed "Raytech"?(I am not sure about the brand name of the system) turbo charger! I was floored! I am going to see the car this week and I am wondering if it might be a Yenko Turbo Z.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-23-2001, 06:33 PM
bkhpah bkhpah is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Latrobe, PA
Posts: 4,861
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

Its likley a Rayjay unit..BKH
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-23-2001, 06:50 PM
PxTx's Avatar
PxTx PxTx is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Glenside, PA 19038
Posts: 2,632
Thanks: 30
Thanked 57 Times in 41 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

I personally don't know how the Yenko Turbo Z's ran, but gosh those Pontiac 301 Turbos sure were a disappointment.

Does anyone know how the two different F-bodies compare, both on the performance side and driveability?

At least we know the General got it right once EFI became popular!

Paul Tholey
__________________
Paul III
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-23-2001, 07:27 PM
bowtie3168 bowtie3168 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincroft, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

Paul,
The Yenko Turbo Z was a very interesting ride. Brian told me that the cars ran in the 14 second range (1/4 mile). The cars fuel economical and dependable. Better than the 301 Ponchos.

Brian,
I am going to check the documents on the '81 Z and I will get the vin # too.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-23-2001, 09:45 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

Well, within the last year, my buddy "Mo" bought a Yenko T/Z, and then another friend here in town bought an '81 301 Turbo. They are COMPLETELY different animals. It's almost as if the 301 NEEDS the turbo just to move, while the Yenko's turbo is just there to "help out" when more power is needed. I have ridden in both, and I would have to say the win light would definitely light up for the Yenko...probably pretty easy.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-23-2001, 11:40 PM
bowtie3168 bowtie3168 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Lincroft, New Jersey, USA
Posts: 360
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lot # 605 at the

That 301 was a real bummer. Sad, do you know that the 301 Poncho is one of the only "conventional" V-8s that Edelbrock does not make an intake manifold for? I think that says it all.

Andrew
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.