Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#15
09-19-2017, 01:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
N632486 was final-assembled on or about Tuesday, April 22.
Many ZL1s have 02D body tags and were final assembled March 4-March 12. Our '67 Z28 had an 06E tag and was final-assembled July 12, 1967. The body tag date is not a 'build date'. 
|
|
#17
09-19-2017, 04:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sonny Tindal is still bustin' up the 1320 to this day.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22 1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to markjohnson For This Useful Post: | ||
young (09-19-2017) | ||
|
#18
09-19-2017, 04:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The body tag week indicated on the TT approximates the build start. There are always exceptions, but why would Chevrolet put anything in that spot on the TT if it means nothing? Do you have many 04A and 04B TT weeks recorded in the CRG date base?
|
|
#19
09-19-2017, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Chevrolet didn't put it there; Fisher Body did. As John Z has stated, the body tag meant nothing to Chevrolet assembly. They had no need to reference it.
The date on the tag indicates when it was released to production by Fisher Body. Fisher regularly skipped weeks; June & July 1969 are perfect examples. Some cars at Van Nuys with 04D and 05A tags were built in June. Some 05A units were built in July. Norwood '67 Camaro N100001 has an 09B tag. Our db has over 150 '67s with earlier tag dates, a few back to May '66.
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to William For This Useful Post: | ||
Linear Mode
