Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:09 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

Whatever... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]

Your opinion goes against what Jim Mattison, who was involved in the build of many rare cars back in the day, through his position within the Central Office (COPO), has stated on numerous occasions.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-22-2013, 09:42 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

They were not trying to get a convertible approved, just parts. It was built as a vert because that is what Estes preferred.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2013, 11:58 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 263
Thanked 3,002 Times in 834 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

The Estes '68 Z/28 convertible was built July 1968 virtually at the end of '68 production.

Many of the parts Estes is alleged to have &quot;approved&quot; as a result were featured in the May 1968 Hot Rod magazine in an article titled &quot;Just For Fun: 68 1/2 Chevys&quot;. In addition Car &amp; Driver tested a cross-ram/JL8 '68 Z/28 in the July '68 issue. Magazine lead times are about 3 months so these events took place around March 1968, 4 months before the Z/28 convertible was built.

The K66 TI ignition had been a regular production option for years at that point; headers were optional on the '67 Z/28. Wayne's Guinn's Book &quot;Camaro Untold Secrets&quot; has all the info. Chevy had a JL8 engineering car by October '67; some cross-ram docs are dated August '67.

I cannot believe the BS surrounding this car.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-23-2013, 02:32 AM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

So you are saying Mattison, the go to guy within our hobby regarding special built (COPO) cars is spreading BS? Wow...
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2013, 03:52 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,689
Thanks: 263
Thanked 3,002 Times in 834 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

YOU are the guy that brought his name into this. I never quoted anyone; no idea where the story came from. A lot of people believe it; could not possibly be true. That's what makes it BS.

Nice try Tom.

Instead of dragging a name into this in an attempt to antagonize, why don't you simply explain how a car built July '68 could have had anything to do with parts that were available months prior? Explain the May '68 Hot Rod photo feature. Explain the engineering documents with '67 dates in Guinn's book.

I guess you aren't comfortable with the facts.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2013, 10:31 AM
Ryan1969Chevelle's Avatar
Ryan1969Chevelle Ryan1969Chevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Beautiful Elora Ontario Canada
Posts: 5,992
Thanks: 615
Thanked 944 Times in 480 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

&quot;Oh no you didn't&quot;

Play nice, you both obviously have much knowledge and interest, share and enjoy this wonderful website.

Ryan
__________________


1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold
1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold
1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2013, 02:27 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

I will be the first to admit that I am no expert, far from it, when it comes to discussing rare muscle cars, but, will go to bat for the ones who do have first hand knowledge, such as Mr. Mattison, who are willing to share their knowledge with us. Unfortunately, because of folks such as William, who basically said Jim was full of crap, many of these folks decide it is simply not worth their time to get involved.. Several, who once posted on this site, because of such key board no it alls, no longer do so, a loss for all of us. I for one hope Jim continues to share his vast knowledge of COPO cars, not only on this site, but in person, at such events as MCACN.


BTW, here is a thread on another site where you challenge both Jim Mattison and Scott Settlemire (another GM exec).

Estes Z-28
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2013, 03:08 PM
PxTx's Avatar
PxTx PxTx is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Glenside, PA 19038
Posts: 2,632
Thanks: 30
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

Seems like a reasonable question/challenge from the data presented.
__________________
Paul III
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2013, 04:53 PM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,050
Thanks: 533
Thanked 4,971 Times in 1,265 Posts
Default Re: 67 427 Chevelle

I think the production facts speak for themselves. Since this thread is getting ugly I am locking it. Take the ugliness elsewhere if you can't be civil.
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.