Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whatever... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img]
Your opinion goes against what Jim Mattison, who was involved in the build of many rare cars back in the day, through his position within the Central Office (COPO), has stated on numerous occasions.
__________________
Tom Clary |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
They were not trying to get a convertible approved, just parts. It was built as a vert because that is what Estes preferred.
__________________
Tom Clary |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Estes '68 Z/28 convertible was built July 1968 virtually at the end of '68 production.
Many of the parts Estes is alleged to have "approved" as a result were featured in the May 1968 Hot Rod magazine in an article titled "Just For Fun: 68 1/2 Chevys". In addition Car & Driver tested a cross-ram/JL8 '68 Z/28 in the July '68 issue. Magazine lead times are about 3 months so these events took place around March 1968, 4 months before the Z/28 convertible was built. The K66 TI ignition had been a regular production option for years at that point; headers were optional on the '67 Z/28. Wayne's Guinn's Book "Camaro Untold Secrets" has all the info. Chevy had a JL8 engineering car by October '67; some cross-ram docs are dated August '67. I cannot believe the BS surrounding this car.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
So you are saying Mattison, the go to guy within our hobby regarding special built (COPO) cars is spreading BS? Wow...
__________________
Tom Clary |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
YOU are the guy that brought his name into this. I never quoted anyone; no idea where the story came from. A lot of people believe it; could not possibly be true. That's what makes it BS.
Nice try Tom. Instead of dragging a name into this in an attempt to antagonize, why don't you simply explain how a car built July '68 could have had anything to do with parts that were available months prior? Explain the May '68 Hot Rod photo feature. Explain the engineering documents with '67 dates in Guinn's book. I guess you aren't comfortable with the facts.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Oh no you didn't"
Play nice, you both obviously have much knowledge and interest, share and enjoy this wonderful website. Ryan
__________________
1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I will be the first to admit that I am no expert, far from it, when it comes to discussing rare muscle cars, but, will go to bat for the ones who do have first hand knowledge, such as Mr. Mattison, who are willing to share their knowledge with us. Unfortunately, because of folks such as William, who basically said Jim was full of crap, many of these folks decide it is simply not worth their time to get involved.. Several, who once posted on this site, because of such key board no it alls, no longer do so, a loss for all of us. I for one hope Jim continues to share his vast knowledge of COPO cars, not only on this site, but in person, at such events as MCACN.
BTW, here is a thread on another site where you challenge both Jim Mattison and Scott Settlemire (another GM exec). Estes Z-28
__________________
Tom Clary |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seems like a reasonable question/challenge from the data presented.
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the production facts speak for themselves. Since this thread is getting ugly I am locking it. Take the ugliness elsewhere if you can't be civil.
__________________
...... |
![]() |
|
|