Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-02-2010, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
VIN vs Assembly date
Am I missing something with these dates?
Wouldn't a T0415MN engine have been built about 3 weeks after a car with a 9N62019x VIN?  http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-427-...=item3efc80c81a 
|
|
#2
02-02-2010, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VIN vs Assembly date
I don't know whether that engine would fit the assembly time frame or not
 , but that seller seems to be pulling some shenanigans with many of his "just realized I had"  items.
__________________
Rick 69 Chevelle SS396 Silver L78 M21 Post Sedan (Berger Chev.) 69 Chevelle SS396 Black L78 4-speed 4.10 Post Sedan  Don't text and drive. Somebody's life may depend on it!
|
|
#3
02-03-2010, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VIN vs Assembly date
According to CRG, last vin out in March was 623587, so that seems a little late. Might check with Kurt S or Mark C. There are some exceptions, but don't know about this one.
|
|
#4
02-03-2010, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VIN vs Assembly date
How about the 67 MO 302 the same guy has for sale??
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1967-CAMA...=item3efc81000c has anyone asked for a pic of the front pad for these two motors? thanks
|
|
#5
02-03-2010, 06:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: VIN vs Assembly date
His distributor and alternator pictures are conveniently fuzzy.
__________________
Day 2 is Life.
|
|
#6
02-03-2010, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: VIN vs Assembly date
I've talked to this guy on the phone, and he used to have a company called ASL in Nevada.
I was trying to get better pics of an 837 alt. he says he pulled off his COPO Camaro. Never did get any pics and I told him what I thought about his business practices.  
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
