Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Pontiac


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1041  
Old 09-17-2010, 02:51 AM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,598 Times in 812 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Full part # is UR4GP 2869 G Power.
Reply With Quote
  #1042  
Old 09-17-2010, 03:14 AM
VintageMusclecar's Avatar
VintageMusclecar VintageMusclecar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 183
Thanked 186 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

(edit* you posted your above reply while I was typing this one, hence some redundancy)

The 2869 is also numbered as a UR4GP. A Platinum that's one step colder would be a UR5GP. A "standard" NGK that's 1 step colder would be a UR5. (Personally, I've never had any luck with platinum plugs in anything other than late model EFI stuff)

Loosely translated, the 2869's appear to be the equivalent of a R45TS and the UR5's would be the equivalent of an R44TS.

I would expect the engine to be done by 5K if it's in stock form. All of the "stock" Pontiacs I've ever worked with liked to be shifted <5K for best performance. I also recall that most of them liked a total timing figure of 30°-32° as well. (FWIW, I'm referencing some of these figures from a friend's `76 TA with a `69 RAIII 400 in it that's dipped into the high 12's in factory trim on more than one occasion)

Phil did your carb, didn't he? If so, I believe he normally richens them up just a tad, so the carb should be good to go. You might try richening up the trim screws maybe 1/8 turn and see if that makes any difference on the plugs.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #1043  
Old 09-17-2010, 03:37 AM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,598 Times in 812 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Yes, got the carb from Phil at Custom Rebuilt Carburetors in Middlesex, NJ about 6 years ago.

I set the idle mixture to the highest vacuum reading i could get which was something crazy like 23 inches. Probably running a bit lean then. I will richen it up and maybe back off the timing a degree or two. As for the rpm range it's kind of hard to be accurate since the factory tachs are slow and rather inaccurate. So the nosing over could be earlier in the power range.

I will tinker with it this weekend and report back.
Reply With Quote
  #1044  
Old 09-18-2010, 01:41 PM
68 Vert 68 Vert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 263
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Steve, my former WW5 HO car would nose over around 4,500...I ended up changing the metering rods and adjusting the secondary air valve. Problem solved.
To start, make sure you have the correct metering rods, hanger and cam. I would start with 3/4 to 1 full turn on the air valve and go from there.

I'll see if I can find which rods I used...

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #1045  
Old 09-18-2010, 02:22 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,598 Times in 812 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

What you describe is exactly it. It seems to run out of gas at that rpm. The secondaries open very smoothly and without any bog or hesitation so hopefully it's a metering rod thing. I don't have much experience in tuning quadrajets. Any recommended websites for info (or local NJ people in the area).
Reply With Quote
  #1046  
Old 09-18-2010, 07:26 PM
68 Vert 68 Vert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 263
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Some info here: http://www.florida4x4.com/tech/quadrajet/ Download the Q-Jet tuning paper...the writer is a little over the top but you'll get the idea.

Checking/adjusting the air valve is pretty simple. I would tighten the spring by a 1/4-1/2 turn and see what kind of change you see/feel. This alone may fix the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #1047  
Old 09-18-2010, 08:04 PM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,598 Times in 812 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Drove her over to my buddy's garage this morning and got some underside shots, since all I have to this date are the ones taken from a creeper 6" underneath the car when it was on jack stands.












Reply With Quote
  #1048  
Old 09-18-2010, 08:52 PM
mockingbird812's Avatar
mockingbird812 mockingbird812 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dayton
Posts: 14,402
Thanks: 908
Thanked 799 Times in 482 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

Swell underside Steve. Very nice!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img]
__________________
Sam...

Reply With Quote
  #1049  
Old 09-19-2010, 12:48 AM
x  Baldwin  Motion's Avatar
x Baldwin Motion x  Baldwin  Motion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 41N 72 18.5W Sag Harbor NY
Posts: 6,640
Thanks: 218
Thanked 179 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mockingbird812</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Swell underside Steve. Very nice!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/beers.gif[/img] </div></div>



yeah, I can hardly see any AC comp fluid [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #1050  
Old 09-19-2010, 01:12 AM
njsteve's Avatar
njsteve njsteve is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJUSA
Posts: 8,318
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,598 Times in 812 Posts
Default Re: 72 TA : New Project

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 68 Vert</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Steve, my former WW5 HO car would nose over around 4,500...I ended up changing the metering rods and adjusting the secondary air valve. Problem solved.
To start, make sure you have the correct metering rods, hanger and cam. I would start with 3/4 to 1 full turn on the air valve and go from there.

I'll see if I can find which rods I used...

Mike </div></div>

I checked and the metering rods are the stock CR rods. Just out of curiosity, what would the recommended change be from there?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.