Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
09-09-2007, 08:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
OK! A fire truck with a 409?
__________________
|
|
#2
09-09-2007, 08:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Verne......
I'm on your side......would love a 409......even in a fire truck!!!!!!!!
__________________
Baseball, Hot Dogs, Apple Pie and Chevrolet
|
|
#3
09-09-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Pretty cool fire truck...
__________________
 <span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
|
|
#4
09-09-2007, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[/ QUOTE ] ZL1 corvette = Supercar in my book!  Patrick [/ QUOTE ] The 1969 ZL1 Corvette is not a SUPERCAR by definition, its only another square port car that was available to the mass public that wasn't ordered through COPO. I hope this helps.
|
|
#5
09-09-2007, 07:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] ZL1 corvette = Supercar in my book! Patrick [/ QUOTE ] The 1969 ZL1 Corvette is not a SUPERCAR by definition, its only another square port car that was available to the mass public that wasn't ordered through COPO. I hope this helps. [/ QUOTE ] If anyone doesn't get it by now, they will never get it! Talk about beating a dead horse...Geez 
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com
|
|
#6
09-09-2007, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
I think it's been made quite clear to those of us who don't have a supercar by this sites definition.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand)
|
|
#7
09-09-2007, 10:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
Imagine going to a show with your ZL1 corvette and trying to park in the section that is marked "supercars", only to be told youd have to park in the 1968 to 1972 corvette section because the last spot was taken by a 69 LM1 camaro paint delete car.
|
|
#8
09-10-2007, 04:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] ZL1 corvette = Supercar in my book! Patrick [/ QUOTE ] The 1969 ZL1 Corvette is not a SUPERCAR by definition, its only another square port car that was available to the mass public that wasn't ordered through COPO. I hope this helps. [/ QUOTE ] Yes this is getting ridiculous but if one of these should ever show up at F.A.S.T. or Pure Stock races, finely tuned,  , most "supercars" would be reading its license plate from the rear!  Patrick
|
|
#10
09-10-2007, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
if the thread is so stupid why do you all keep replying?
__________________
Founder of Lost Muscle Cars Discovered; 1968 Dick Harrell L88 Super Chevelle, 1969 Ford Boss Bronco, 1969 KK1201 Boss 429 Prototype, 1964 Savoy 426 Max Wedge (steel nose), 1969 Nova L78 Yenko Sold
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
