Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old 11-01-2006, 06:44 PM
WILMASBOYL78's Avatar
WILMASBOYL78 WILMASBOYL78 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: new york
Posts: 8,409
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,269 Times in 605 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

[ QUOTE ]
WAIT !

Maybe this is the rationale:

Since the 396 was bored +.030 ( actually a 402 ) in 1970,
the HP rating would have been boosted and perhaps that is
why the L/35 disappeared. Still to this day, I wonder why
they made the 402. It almost seems like a manufacturing
mistake that got away from them. Does anyone know for sure
why the 402 came into existence?

[/ QUOTE ]

There have been many theories over the years, but nothing concrete as far as I know. As for HP going up with the .30 extra, most would say the extra cubes are offset by the lowrise intake manifolds that came on the 70 models. Chevy also added the TCS smog crap in 70, that probably didn't help. Most guys in the day swapped out the lowrise for a 163 or aftermarket unit. Regarding the 402 size, didn't GM have a restriction on engine size in midsize and smallcars of 400 cid...I believe that was lifted in 70,hence the 454 Chevelle was available. Just my thoughts....

wilma
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95
Lots of L78 Novas
Join National Nostalgic Nova!
70 Orange Cooler
69 Camaro
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.