Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2006, 02:53 PM
1969L78Nova 1969L78Nova is offline
Yenko Paid Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 364
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

Must have been a MONDAY car. Remember the days when they gave you the build date of the car when it was ordered. You dreaded that it wasn't a Monday car.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2006, 06:42 PM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,430
Thanks: 32,994
Thanked 4,572 Times in 1,934 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

-------Funny you mention that, Lynn. My wife once went to pick up her new company car and recieved a half Horizon half Omni, but split front (Hotizon) to rear (Omni). We always called that car the Horomni. It may have had a dual personality but it actually was a good little car.........Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2006, 06:14 PM
Enoch Enoch is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 6,747
Thanks: 260
Thanked 123 Times in 64 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

There's no plant designation. and the first 6 is should be a 9 it's upside down. The first 8 should be an L because I think by 2-20 of 69 norwood cars had the vin by the oil rail.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:09 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,928
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,556 Times in 1,436 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

It also looks like Flint used the number 0 & the letter o,as well as two different type set number 2's.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:17 PM
Zedder's Avatar
Zedder Zedder is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,329
Thanks: 100
Thanked 642 Times in 354 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

The deck surface and engine assembly date and code look OK to me. I'm seeing more and more "deep" broach marks in '69 and '70 cars than I usually see in '67 cars...not sure why that would be, but it is definitely very noticeable on many Tonawanda BB's. I can't comment on the VIN derivative as I don't follow '69 Camaros.

I also think that improvements in digital cameras are giving us much more definition than years past and this is raising concerns unnecessarily in some cases.
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:52 PM
TimG TimG is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,517
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2,495 Times in 984 Posts
Default Re: Engine stamping...comments ?

Here's what I've heard about broach marks. As the broach machine lost its sharpness, the cutting edge or edges were sharpened. When the broach was sharpened, they would surface the hi performance blocks first, this could mean that they would surface the four bolt main blocks first since they were going to have a higher compression.
I don't know if this is true or not, but the broach certainly would wear down leaving different types of broach marks. I've always noticed more of a pattern on big blocks than small blocks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.