![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe GM rated the Vette motor (LT-1) higher than the Z because their premiere car was NOT going to have the same or less hp than the second stringers. Camaros, Deuces etc. The L79 motors in the 65,66,67 chevelles and the 66-67 chevy 11's were the same as the vette. Same components anyways I believe. What was different the oil pan in the chevy 11's? Speak to me I learn more stuff everyday!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I believe GM rated the Vette motor (LT-1) higher than the Z because their premiere car was NOT going to have the same or less hp than the second stringers. [/ QUOTE ] Or did they rate the Z28 motor lower so the Vette would still be the top performer? ![]()
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought that chevy wanted the vette to remain top hp dog for marketing reasons.
__________________
Carl ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff and Carl, I think I said that!
![]() ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I believe GM rated the Vette motor (LT-1) higher than the Z because their premiere car was NOT going to have the same or less hp than the second stringers. Camaros, Deuces etc. The L79 motors in the 65,66,67 chevelles and the 66-67 chevy 11's were the same as the vette. Same components anyways I believe. What was different the oil pan in the chevy 11's? Speak to me I learn more stuff everyday! [/ QUOTE ] I always thought it was keeping the vette top dog and the 10 HP dif was open element air cleaner vs the dual snorkel... ![]() JG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there was also a more restrictive exhaust on the z also
__________________
Carl ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|