![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was it simply a sticker change? I thought the L78 Corvette was exatly the same as the L78 Chevelle, but with free flowing Corvette-only manifolds. (plus it was a Corvete, so of course it could have higher HP.)
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Was it simply a sticker change? I thought the L78 Corvette was exatly the same as the L78 Chevelle, but with free flowing Corvette-only manifolds. (plus it was a Corvete, so of course it could have higher HP.) [/ QUOTE ] The sticker was indeed changed but reflected a 425hp output rating at 6400rpm as opposed to the 375hp rating which was established at 5600rpm...The HP changes occurred as a "trickle down" effect after the feds imposed a weight to hp mandate on GMs flagship Corvette. As you stated, the corvette had to maintain its superior hp rating and therefore a decrease in the vette hp rating meant a decreased hp rating for everything else. The L78 Vette and L78 Chevelle had similar engines but not identical. You are correct in that the exhaust manifolds were different...But in additon, the pistons, the cams, the heads, the intakes, the carbs, and distributors were different as well. The 65 vette L78 and 66 Chevelle L78 sported the same 4 bolt block, the same bore and the same steel forged crank... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the education. In 69, were not the heads, pistons, intakes, carbs etc the same, or were they different then, too?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1969 Vette L78?...No such animal
1965 was the only year that an L78 was offered in the corvette. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
1969 Vette L78?...No such animal 1965 was the only year that an L78 was offered in the corvette. [/ QUOTE ] OK, bad example. You said that the L78 Chevelle was a different engine internally than the L78 Corvette. I know you said the L78 Corvette was only available in 65, but the car in question was a 66 Chevelle. So to stick to the question, would the 65 Corvette L78 be the same motor internally as the 65 L78 Chevelle? (Z16) What I'm really trying to learn is if it was "normal" for same coded motors (eg L78. L72, etc) to be different from model to model. I would have thought (pure conjecture) that an L78 was an L78 regardless of the car it was dropped into. (manifolds aside for clearance reasons). I wonder why they would not call it a different "L" number if it were different internally. So maybe a better example of my curiosity is whether the 69 L72 differed internally when the application was a Corvette, Impala, COPO Chevelle, or COPO Camaro. I sure thought they were the same, and assumed other motors would have been the same, too. Same curiosity would hold for other motors that shared "L" numbers, and were available across different applications. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
------Gary,,,For starters, a Z16 would have had a hydraulic cam and lifters. As a matter of fact the Z16 engine was the only square-port engine ever built for a specific option without a solid-lifter cam........Bill S
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
------Gary,,,For starters, a Z16 would have had a hydraulic cam and lifters. As a matter of fact the Z16 engine was the only square-port engine ever built for a specific option without a solid-lifter cam........Bill S [/ QUOTE ] Unreal, here is some information that I hope you find helpful. Anyhow, if you have further questions, just send me a PM. Our discussion should probably take place at another location... An RPO, such as RPO L78, designated a particular block, crankshaft , intake and cylinder head combo for a particular year. Given the same RPO, the same model and the same year, the engine block stamp codes differed as a function of specific trans, carb and cylinder head combos. So going back to your statement, you are correct in your understanding that an L78 is an L78 regardless of the car it was dropped into; the caveat being as long as you are comparing L78 engines from the same year. As you know, L78 engines are different and unique to their specific year of production. The 396 in the 65 Z16 was RPO L37. The 396 in the 65 Vette was RPO L78. They were different in that they sported different cams, carbs and distributors. The cam on the Corvette was mechanical vs that of the Z16 which was hydraulic. So addressing your inquiry regarding 1969 L72: In 1969, the L72 was not available in the Corvette. Remember, the general rule of thumb is that the Vette always maintained its own unique set of RPOs. This was GMs way of maintaining the Corvette’s flagship status. The exception to this rule was the big Impala which borrowed the Vette’s big block engine in 1965 and 1966. GM likely felt this was acceptable because the huge Impala was a far cry from a threat to the sales of the Corvette. They were two different animals. The only time the Vette and Camaro shared the same engine during the same year was when they were both chosen as the recipient vehicles for the aluminum ZL1 engine. Anyhow, the COPO Camaros and COPO Chevelles were bare bone cars that came with the same crankshaft, heads, pistons, intake, and midyear 4 bolt engine block, cast number 3963512 that was designated for the special high performance passenger car. The 1969 COPO cars essentially sported the passenger cars special high performance 427/L72. Just like when the Camaro was chosen as one of the recipient vehicles for the aluminum ZL1 engine, it again’ along with the Chevelle was chosen as the recipient of the passenger cars special high performance 427. The union of the lighter bare bones, Camaro and Chevelle with the omnipotent passenger car’s L72 was achieved via a central office production order (COPO). GM likely allowed the limited production of these COPO cars as they were designated for the drag strip as opposed to the Corvette which was heralded as the all American sports car vs drag car. Nonetheless, the COPO Camaro had the potential to compete with Vette sales so its production was closely regulated by GM. Anyhow, I hope this helps |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|