![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't Ed's certificate sort of negate the need for the perfect storm of paperwork in this case? I don't see the question regarding the authenticity of this one....or am I reading LS6 Rat's post incorrectly?
__________________
Phil '68 YENKO CLONE PROJECT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() X11 71 71, This cars starting price is 189K, and I imagine his reserve is close to 200K. That certainly is a substantial amount of money to pay for a car without docs to prove its provenance. I agree that previous ownership is certainly a valid form for tracking a cars history. And yes there is a fair amount of fraudalent paperwork available. For the most part it is not terribly difficult to distinguish it from authentic pieces.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Racefan, I didn't consider Ed's certificate to be "the last word" for substantiation as a factory COPO Camaro. I think Ed's efforts to confirm a Camaro as a possible COPO built car is commendable, but it is his opinion, and not backed up by any piece of factory produced paperwork that leaves no doubt at all. I certainly think the seller of this Camaro deserves his asking price, provided the car has factory proof of being built as a L72 COP0. Someone who buys a high dollar musclecar without absolute proof from the factory as to its origins is taking quite a gamble in my opinion and risks the chance that down the road, proving this car to be the genuine article would be suspect without authentic factory backed docs.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ditto!!!Great statement LS6Rat
__________________
Lately into Beaumont SD's, 66,67,68 and 69 , including a 69 2 Dr Post Beaumont , an L78 2 Dr Post Chevelle LS6 Chevelle's, LS6 and L78 El Camino and Camaro fan ! Also 2 Cdn Documented COPO's, a COPO Camaro and COPO Chevelle Love GM Products |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i guess that some of us green, newbie, etc. people have trouble distinguishing factory documents that have been created so to speak. i still believe that speaking to an original owner has got to carry considerable weight , when you are checking out a car.... and last time i checked that wasn't considered a factory document.
regarding ed c., in my opinion he has provided a lot of information and service to the hobby, people are imperfect, in fact cars and documentation are sometimes less than perfect as well. i think the hobby at times gets too hung up on the perfect factory documentation ![]() |