1969 Camaro Trunk Lid Question

[HiHorse]

[ QUOTE ]
The shapes of the openings on the back side are different and the date codes are in different places.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you be more specific about the openings? are all different? Where is the date code located on the 69?

[P.J.]

does anyone out there have a pic of both
PJ

[Seattle Sam]

Here is a '67 decklid. Only had holes in teh underframe to mount the emblem, none for the spoiler.

[cib12]

did they use a different lid if you ordered a luggage rack?

[Seattle Sam]

I believe the luggage rack was a dealer add-on, so the decklid would have been the same.

[Kurt S]

This is off the top of my head, so it might not be exact and I can't remember the third 67 variation:

67 - no emblem holes
- with emblem holes
68 - spoiler access holes
69 - " "
- with tabs around outside
- no tabs

[Thomas]

There was a great article in Muscle Car Review that showed the differences in the 3 '69 trunk lids. Brian Henderson provided the information for this article. If I remember correctly it was about restoration mistakes for '69 Camaros. I can try to dig up the article and scan it if anyone is interested.

[P.J.]

[ QUOTE ]
There was a great article in Muscle Car Review that showed the differences in the 3 '69 trunk lids. Brian Henderson provided the information for this article. If I remember correctly it was about restoration mistakes for '69 Camaros. I can try to dig up the article and scan it if anyone is interested.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thomas If you can find the article it would be nice to
see it .
Please post it.
PJ

[Steve Shauger]

[ QUOTE ]
This is off the top of my head, so it might not be exact and I can't remember the third 67 variation:

67 - no emblem holes
- with emblem holes
68 - spoiler access holes
69 - " "
- with tabs around outside
- no tabs

[/ QUOTE ]

Late 67 trunk lids did have spoiler access holes. I know July cars did and I believe June as well.

[Jonesy]

Here is my May 67 z/28 lid: