![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick can you be a littel more specific
on where you need the measurements as a sketch would be better for me. And How do I measure the lenght of the axil shaft when it is on the car?? send me an email if necessary. PJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick
the measurement from backing plate to backing plate is 53 inches. PJ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is the spring perch center to center 42 1/2 inches
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes its 42 1/2 centre to centre
PJ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A few years ago,I found a #341 coded COV rear for sale at Morris.
The seller told me it was exclusive to the 70 Camaro,not just by the axle code,but by the size of the #341 housing as well..I was stunned to hear that and asked in what way.He showed me,and said he was going by what someone from nastyZ28 told him what to look for,& recommended I contact that person to learn more.I did eventually contact him and he was very nice about it & told me the measurement differences were longer due to the new Camaros bodystyle. I have a friend with a 70 Nova w/a #860 CBS rear,so we measured his and I compared it to the measurements I took off the one at Morris,which did conflict with our precise figures,give or take 1/16". <u>COV</u> Axle shaft length 30-3/16". Axle tube flange to flange 55-1/4". Spring seat center to center 45-5/16". <u>CBS</u> Axle shaft length 29-9/16". Axle tube flange to flange 54-1/4". Spring seat center to center 42-7/16". I honestly don't know if this is a special secret or just misinformation,as I have not read about it elsewhere.But I don't frequent the Camaro/Nova forums as much & would like to hear what others have found on theirs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No mystery at all.
341 is just the center section. It can be used in any application that didn't need the top mounting points (like Chevelles used). Assemble with the correct axle tubes and components and ship.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That does make sense.
So the minimal measurement differences could just be due to how the workers assembled the components into them?..or even wear/age? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|