![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a re-stamp on one of the cars now and am probably going to get another.But my concern now is being considered a fraud.I can't see how a re-stamp could be considered anything more than a reproduction.A trim tag is a different matter all together. I only buy real cars but do put repop parts on them out of necessity.
__________________
"Knowledge is good" Emil Fabor 67 L/78 Camaro SS/RS H-H,1W,2LGSR,3SL,4K,5BY. (Sold) 70 L/78 Nova M-21,Black Cherry,Sandalwood Int. 09 Pontiac G8 GT Premium,Sport,Roof. Liquid Red. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Isn't it better to put a blank casting on rather than a restamp? Restamps are to fool people (judges, buyers etc). If I have no motive I would never waste my money to buy a restamped part.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Isn't it better to put a blank casting on rather than a restamp? [/ QUOTE ]Glad to see I'm not the only one that thinks that way! ![]() My numbers-match 67 GTO had a Chevy 61-amp alternator on it. Figure with 81,XXX miles it only makes sense that it would have been replaced at some point, but I didn't like the fact that it's the WRONG one. I obtained two alternators, both stamped on different halves, and will be combining them to create a numberless alternator. This is, in my mind, "more correct" than the rather common 1100704, 37A alt even though a properly dated 'correct' original really wouldn't cost much either. The water pump had been replaced but I've rectified that too with a correct casting that doesn't have a date on it. Despite the fact that the originals are long gone these parts aren't "wrong" anymore and I'm not trying to fool anyone... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|