Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry quicky, I can't agree. I can only agree with the Clinton comparison. I know everyone wants to get the most for their car, but that description demands disclosure of a nom motor and non-original fender tags.
"Car is 3 Fender Tag car" we don't know if it is or not! That wording, to me, implies that it came that way. ![]() As a buyer i would rather get a good and true full description of the car. Facts like it has a good and correct date coded motor. Eventually a buyer will see the attempt at "deception by omission" and will now doubt the whole car and probably walk. I am from the camp of put the whole ball of wax out there, not semantic games. that said, i hope the car does well. Its a very nice real, NOM, made up fender tag with great un documented options and a great looking resto 71 hemicuda. ![]() knowing the truth, you can't read that description and not feel a little violated. just my opinion, Respectfully, John ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|