Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-14-2007, 07:36 AM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 1
Thanked 77 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro Smog System Question

Rick,
I know that's why they used the over valve cover one on A/C cars. My point was that if they used the A/C type one on a solid lifter car, they would need to remove the check valve every time they adjusted the valves. It doesn't make sense that GM would use the over cover unit when they had an alternative already in the parts bin that would not require disassembly to adjust the valves.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-14-2007, 07:54 AM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 21,017
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,726 Times in 1,499 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro Smog System Question

It was probably all about cost & simplicity to themselves.
Why make two design tubes,when one design would accommodate both,where as the earlier would not.As at that time,they were well in the planning/design stages of the 71-72 models,most likely seeing the writing on the wall with the mandatory implement of A.I.R being required on ALL vehicles in the upcoming years,which meant A/C equipped Hydra lifter BB too.
Add to that,I think they pretty much new 99.9% of all new car Hi-perf owners were going to pitch the entire A.I.R. system within one hour of taking delivery anyway,so it getting in the way of adjusting valves would become a moot point.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-14-2007, 05:37 PM
nuch_ss396 nuch_ss396 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1969 Camaro Smog System Question

[ QUOTE ]
....Add to that,I think they pretty much new 99.9% of all new car Hi-perf owners were going to pitch the entire A.I.R. system within one hour of taking delivery anyway,so it getting in the way of adjusting valves would become a moot point.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rick,

That is exactly what I believe the rationale was for use
of only the over the valve cover tube design. Does anyone
remember seeing a SHP engine with the AIR system intact
back in the day? I sure don't.....

Taking off the SMOG system didn't cost anything. You
gained some HP! Weren't we all trying to squeak as much HP
out of these cars as we could?

And as you've observed, GM knew most SHP owners were removing
these systems to gain HP. So it was a

Steve
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.