Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pete,
My research shows that they used the same camshaft between the two years I mentioned above. Anders, I expect that the exhaust has maybe 20-25hp gain. Does the TI ignition add the remainder of the hp gain? Steve
__________________
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is what I got one time when I asked this question.
Insurance concerns plus General Motors Corporate policies resulted in the use of a lower RPM rating resulting in decrease from 425 HP to 375 HP as a running change for all models except corvette. The L-78 was released for sale in the 1966 SS-396 Chevelle in March 1966 with a rating of 375 HP due to this lower RPM rating and somewhat more restrictive exhaust manifolds, it was otherwise identical to the 425 HP '65 Corvette.( same cam) The 1965 Z-16 396 Chevelle had the same engine except the Z-16 used a hydraulic camshaft which effectively limited RPM to the lower 375 HP rating.(L-37) Also all of my 66 Impala/ Biscayne l-72 427's came with the 3880827 and 828 vet exhaust manifolds originally. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
My '66 Impala SS L72 also came with the Corvette cast iron exhaust manifolds.
__________________
PaulD '64 R-Code Mercury '62 421 SD Catalina '66 L72 Impala SS '66 R-Code Fairlane |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wasn't the L72 rated at 450hp initially and then lowered to 425hp....??? Read an interesting article the other day about a dyno test on the original 65 L78 and then revised results following a blueprint by Bill Thomas...these motors seemed to need a little help to achieve the factory ratings...
Neat stuff..wilma ![]()
__________________
02 Berger 380hp #95 Lots of L78 Novas Join National Nostalgic Nova! 70 Orange Cooler 69 Camaro |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes sir it was on the l-72. I have never heard of a 66 chevelle however even the early ones being rated at 425.
learned something new today |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think GM changed ratings at times with a stroke of a pen. A lot depended on insurance companies back in those days and the cars they wanted to promote.
![]() |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I recently had a 70 L78 rebuilt dead stock except for a .030 overbore (70 396'a started life as a 402) 11:1 compression (verifed) nos 143 cam, 569 intake, 4557 holley, stock distributor, stock, uncut heads (hardened seats)stock valve size. Motor was pretty much clearenced and balanced. 422 hp @ 5900 WITH headers, 400 lbs torque on the Dyno. Everything is essentially the same as the 65-69 L78 except the intake (flatter, slightly lower performance) and the I think the 291 heads (70) may have had slightly larger valves vs. the 840 and also what equates to a .060 over bore over an actual 396 inch motor WITH headers, so who knows for sure..
__________________
70 L78 Nova Fathom Blue,Bench, 4spd, F41, 3:55 71 Porsche 911 Targa |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have never Dynoed the different exhaust manifolds side by side but it would be no where near a 50 hp difference.
The top dog prior to the mystery motor was the 409/425. GM could not go backwards in the public eye/marketing, at least at the initial release of their new solid lifter engine. Some early '66 L78 Chevelles have been documented as showing the L78 option rated at 425hp. I believe Bill Thomas' Blue printing guide/book has a dyno chart or info showing that the L78 could produce 425hp if brought to exact specs. The First 427/L72s were factory rated at 450hp. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|