Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
11-02-2006, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1967 Z/28
[ QUOTE ]
Can someone post the prior stamp thread mentioned? Any known reason why the vin tag has a std pop rivet. Looks like a cool car. Thanks, [/ QUOTE ] The previous post was made by quick-bowtie on 2/24/06, I am attempting to post the link link to pad stamping post
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS '77 Bronco 
|
|
#2
11-03-2006, 04:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
I don't get the date stamp. How can that be correct? Just asking.
The motor build date doesn't even fall into the last week of June, 1967. The 3rd of July in 1967 was on a Monday and would have placed the engine build date in 07A. The VIN on the car falls in with the cowl tag of 06E . There were 5 weeks in June with Friday being June 30. Even if the week ended on Sunday, that was July 2nd. Last I knew the week didn't end on a Monday.  What makes it even more confusing is the VIN is a few thousand before the end of the June month VIN. Add in the fact the M and O look out of whack and more  These cars whether a Z or not all rolled down the same assembly line did they not? Was a motor not available when this one came down the line until the following week?? The car is still nice regardless. Rick H.
|
|
#3
11-03-2006, 04:47 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Read this for your answers...assume that the body build at Fisher was started late in the Day Friday June 30th and it will all make sense to you...
http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml
__________________
Mark
|
|
#4
11-03-2006, 05:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Not sure how an engine could be assembled at Flint, after the car was built at Norwood?
Don't really understand that part, but the MO part is how they did it. The MO is the only part of the stamp pad that I really like... I would like to see a close up of the VIN that is stamped on the trans? Very Nice car.  Here is a picture of a untouched pad from a 67 SS350 Sold this car last year, was absolutely the original engine. 
|
|
#5
11-03-2006, 05:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
[ QUOTE ]
Here is a picture of a untouched pad from a 67 SS350 Sold this car last year, was absolutely the original engine. [/ QUOTE ] Now that VIN and engine stamp works. VIN is first week of June with an end of May engine stamp.  Rick H.
|
|
#6
11-03-2006, 06:02 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
I actually like the 7N247 and I like the V07 MO
Not sure about that other stuff - is the pad completly flat? Beautiful Car 
|
|
#7
11-03-2006, 06:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Hey Joe...rather than wallow in the mud, I'll go with my understanding of '67 Z's and Jerry MacNeish's certification and gladly give you what you paid me for the car last October
 This is a very nice, driveable '67 Z guys...someone should pick her up!!!
__________________
Mark
|
|
#8
11-03-2006, 05:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
With a VIN of 247737 and a final VIN in June of apprx 251048 I don't see this car beng built on June 30th. Especially with a production of 912 cars a day at a plant that only produced Camaros.
251048-247737=3311/912=3.63days before June 30th. Puts it about the middle of the day the 27th of June. Almost a full week before the engine was made????? So yes, that answers my question. Rick H.
|
Hybrid Mode
