Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 11-04-2006, 05:28 AM
ohhawk ohhawk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 430
Thanks: 3
Thanked 68 Times in 19 Posts
Default Re: Why no L35 in 1970?

"As it was, the leftover "396" identification on the fenders was incorrect anyway since the '70 Super Sport's standard Mk IV big-block in truth displaced the 402ci thanks to a minimal overbore first done very late in the 1969 model run. Not wanting to confuse a good thing, Chevy officials continued to advertise the '70 SS Chevelle as a 396, and all mentions of standard power listed the "396 Turbo-Jet", as did the air cleaner decal under an SS's hood. Scrambling the picture even more was the new 330hp LS3 402ci big-block, which Chevrolet labeled a 400. Not to be confused with the equally new, correctly identified 400ci small-block--a siamesed cylinder evolution of the famed Chevy V-8 that first appeared beneath the "Hot One's" hood in 1955--the LS3 Turbo-Jet 400 was available on all V-8 Chevelle models except SS 396s, the first time a big-block was offered by Chevrolet in an A-body without SS equipment."

....quote from Chevelle 1964-1972 Muscle Car History book

Sounds to me like the short answer to the original poster's question is MARKETING.
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.