Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:36 AM
396L35's Avatar
396L35 396L35 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herculaneum, MO
Posts: 1,807
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

I was just giving an example for the guy with the L78, I didn't mean to confuse anyone... Sorry
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:39 AM
Rick H Rick H is offline
Yenko Premier Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Warsaw, NY
Posts: 1,002
Thanks: 10
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

Not you, Mark.

Rick H.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2006, 03:57 AM
LS6 RAT LS6 RAT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nevada City, California
Posts: 275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

This topic is certainly of interest to me, we had a similar discussion over on the Corvette Forum site, discussing a '69 tri-power 'vette missing its original engine, but has 'build sheet' to prove how factory equipped.

Several did not consider it a tri-power Corvette anymore without its original engine, others stated it was, because it had proof that it came that way. The engine itself is what made the car, without it, it is just another "as built" Corvette, however a Shelby GT 500 missing its original 428 Cobra Jet engine would still be considered a Shelby because of the unique features the car was built with. A Hemi 'cuda without its engine, is still a Hemi'cuda because of its unique frame/body alterations which make it destinct from other models. A Boss 429 Mustang, same way. However what about an LT-1 Corvette, special engine, if missing, does the big block hood, larger exhaust piping make it unique enough from other 'vettes to still call it an LT-1? I guess what I'm infering is, that the car itself without drivetrain, is it enough to still be what it was, without unique features of the body to set it apart from other models? My opinion is that the car itself should have unique features that differ it from its brothers/sisters enough that not just the engine dictates this controversy.
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2006, 04:13 AM
Salvatore Salvatore is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 9,908
Thanks: 3
Thanked 229 Times in 193 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

If the VIN and or paperwork say it is a tri-power corvette it is. Just doesn't have the original engine. If I would put a tri-power motor in a corvette that had a 327 in it originally I could not call it a tri-power car could I? Grumps 68 nova was an L79 car from the factory. He put a BB in it to run SS/D. It was still an L79 car though. JMO
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2006, 04:29 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,408
Thanks: 18,774
Thanked 5,739 Times in 2,427 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

Without a doubt, being a Canadian car thus having bulletproof documents available, this IS an L78 car period. . Actually it's more an L78 than many of the 'real' L78's out there! .

~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2006, 05:05 PM
mrrec mrrec is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tall Corn Country
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

To go one step further, the car is (L78, Z28, 6 cyl, etc.) how it came off the line REGARDLESS if it has docs or not or if the driveline is missing. That is fact. Problem is PROVING it - that's where the docs come in....

Another perspective: If a red car is repainted blue, was it ever a red car?! Simple, really.

Dave
__________________
Dave

www.Z16Chevelle.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2006, 05:49 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,408
Thanks: 18,774
Thanked 5,739 Times in 2,427 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

Like I've said before, nicely put Dave! . You do have a way with words sometimes....is it from practicing on the ladies over the years that fine tuned your skills?? .

~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2006, 06:30 PM
L34Pace L34Pace is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seymour, IN.
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

I'm an owner of a paper documented 68 L78 RS/SS camaro, POP, dealer invoice, window sticker. It did not have the correct L78 engine when I bought it. When asked, I described it then that it "was" an L78 camaro. I have since obtained a 68 camaro MQ L78 block and dressed it correctly with the proper components. Now when asked I say it "is" a documented L78 camaro with NOM. I might be splitting hairs here with the "was" and "is" but we must understand that our hobby continues to evolve and if the hobby is going to prosper we are going to have to look deeper than a correctly stamped block and pay more attention to the cumulative aspects of a presented vehicle. As I've matured in the hobby I'm no longer impressed by a rust bucket 69Z with lepord skin interior and original DZ or a documented shiney 68 L78 with a 1975 454 truck motor. I've talked to way to many guys with the "ultimate" rare car thats been sitting in the garage in a thousand dust covered pieces for twenty years, and to here them say I own a numbers matching this or that with documentation, again, just does'nt impress me much anymore. For me its the sum of the whole presentation and thats when I tip my hat.
__________________
Pat Railsback
67 0-1 Camaro L35/M40/3.07
68 RS/SS Camaro L78/M22/4.56
69 Z11 Camaro L34/M20/3.73
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2006, 08:31 PM
LS6 RAT LS6 RAT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Nevada City, California
Posts: 275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate


Great reasonings! Thanks everyone. That's what I love about this site, intellectual, smart thinking minds!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
2 1971 LS-6 Corvette coupes (Duntov's last stand)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-29-2006, 05:10 PM
Postsedan Postsedan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 12,342
Thanks: 6
Thanked 998 Times in 622 Posts
Default Re: L78 Camaro Debate

[ QUOTE ]
I was just giving an example for the guy with the L78, I didn't mean to confuse anyone... Sorry

[/ QUOTE ]

You guys will have to excuse Mark...if he doen`t have a Portillo`s beef sandwich everyone once and awhile he gets a little cranky.

Dan.
__________________
69 300 Deluxe Post Sedan Frost Green
69 SS396 300 Deluxe Post Sedan Lemans Blue SOLD
70 Buick Skylark Post Sedan Gulfstream Blue
70 Buick Skylark Post Sedan Burnished Saddle

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PM3DE8qI2NY

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn4xEmGypUw
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.