![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
I'm not a Vette expert, but I thought the Vettes went to the right side alternator in the early 1970's. If that holds true, then the motor in your Camaro is a compilation. The rear code is as good of a starting point as you can get. The only hood for your build is the SS louvered hood. My Camaro is a 10-D-68 build ( 69 model ) and I had the louver hood. As you mentioned, the ZL/2 option wasn't into production until after the new year ( 1969 ). One thing cunfuses me. Assuming that the original 396 went bye-bye, why would someone transplant a 454 (low horse) and not use the 69 Camaro setup ( waterpump, pulleys, plumbing, wiring, etc. )? With that short waterpump setup, your fan must be sitting awefully far away from the radiator to enable effective cooling. How does it do in traffic? Oh BTW, my early build Camaro has the same extra holes in the radiator support top as seen in your pictures. I always assumed they were original because my Grandfather never put them there after he bought it new. I honestly never looked at another support for this provision. Guess I will now ! I believe Steve from Long Island has an all original early build L/34. Perhaps he can see if his car has the same hole setup in the radiator support. Steve, you out there? Steve
__________________
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|