value

[Jeff H]

Is the car a 396 car based on the trim tag showing the 4N or 4K? So you're saying it's a 67 SS396 Camaro that was sold by Yenko Chevrolet. I would think that is nothing close to the value of a 67 Yenko Camaro that had a 427 conversion done by Yenko. I would call the 427 Yenko Camaro a supercar but not the regular SS396 Camaro. But we all know putting a value on a car is up to the buyers. Take it to BJ and you'll probably get $200K just by using the Yenko name!

[Kim_Howie]

Jeff, This car went thru Yenko Span not the Yenko dealership. The car has a stock # 742

[Jeff H]

[ QUOTE ]
Jeff, This car went thru Yenko Span not the Yenko dealership. The car has a stock # 742

[/ QUOTE ]

Aha, so it was supposed to be a 427 conversion but for some reason it never got converted?

[sYc]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Jeff, This car went thru Yenko Span not the Yenko dealership. The car has a stock # 742

[/ QUOTE ]

Aha, so it was supposed to be a 427 conversion but for some reason it never got converted?

[/ QUOTE ]

That is the assumption, but no concrete evidence.

[Kim_Howie]

Jeff, I think several of the 67's were not converted.

[Kim_Howie]

Jeff, Yup.

[Salvatore]

Isn't Tom Billigens car an unconverted 68 Yenko?

[Kim_Howie]

That's been my understanding of Tom's car. Very nice looking car.

[Salvatore]

I thought so. I am sure you will not get that car cheap. Conversion or no conversion. If my 69 Z was bought from Baldwin Chevrolet and super tuned by say Bill Mitchell at Motion Performance has to be worth something for that. There is NO conversions but a Motion Performance car by any standards. Maybe Motion installed a set of headers and traction bars. No conversion but you ain't getting it to cheap. She has some history. So where do you draw the line? Or does the insanity never end??

[Stuart Adams]

Kim, good talking to you yesterday. Is the Registry list on the site updated, I know your car is a new find, I don't see your car on the list, or am I missing something.