Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's known that the MV engine had different components. The carb for sure.
COPO orders were done all the time without special engine codes...
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The gibb nova 396 suffix was E3 but the engine had nothing different than any other 396. I feel the E3 meant expermental 3 speed for the auto trans. Maybe GM used this to track them. Maybe they did the same with the MV suffix for the Camaros??
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sounds reasonable to me Kim... Whats different about the carb or any other components on an MV 396?
__________________
Joe Barr |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
But the Nova engine was very different assembly than the standard L78. It had a flexplate attached.
![]() I like that suffix theory. I don't have the carb info in front of me, but I know it was different. Fran pulled the bill of materials for the motors.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
It supposedly had the R4054 68 Corvette 427/425hp carb instead of the normal 396/375hp carb. But, a lot of special carb motors (including ZL-1's) didn't get the carbs listed on the spec sheets due to limited avaliability.
__________________
...................... John Brown This isn't rocket surgery..... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Another good point John. Back to the original question, Kurt, what proof/documentation do you have that shows the use of the magic mirror tag on 68 Yenko cars had anything at all to do with the cars not meeting federal standards?
__________________
Joe Barr |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
And why were those MM tags used, on the other cars in the GM line-up?
Cadillacs, Novas, Rivieras and Impalas? ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|