Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - Canada


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2005, 02:33 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

What functions did you perform Keith ? Very interesting stuff..I have an Oshawa 63 Belair
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2005, 06:01 AM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,086
Thanks: 2
Thanked 781 Times in 363 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml

Keith,
John discusses the change to an integrated plant a little in the first few paragraphs and has posted about that in the past (on camaros.net and on CRG). From what I know, plant setup depended on when you worked there and what division ran the plant. The divided plant was incredibly inefficient.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-2005, 06:16 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

There's a few posts around here with info from Moparts' dad who worked at the St. Louis plant...Fisher body did from the firewall back, then passed the car through a wall to Chevrolet who took it from there. Pretty wild...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:09 AM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

OK My 67 Yenko on the trim tag has 4FK - I started asking about the dash. Nobody knows for sure. I know of 3 67's 375 non Yenko cars that don't have the dash. I know of 3 67 Yenko's that have the dash. I also know of 2 that don't.Yenko I think had ordered several 67's 375 cars at one time. This I think were a fleet order, They have the dashs on them that's all it is not a COPO order. COPO is away to order cars not offered under RPO #s in other words not all dealers could get them. I hope this helps. Kim
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2005, 01:12 AM
Steve Shauger's Avatar
Steve Shauger Steve Shauger is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,467
Thanks: 2,489
Thanked 8,460 Times in 1,716 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

That my understanding as well.
__________________
Steve Shauger
The Supercar Registry
www.yenko.net

Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website:
www.vintagecertification.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-2005, 02:14 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,980
Thanks: 495
Thanked 4,760 Times in 1,221 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

My friends 67 Yenko has the dash ans also has a 1/2" sway bar
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-2005, 03:04 AM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

I bet the car was converted at DH shop.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-2005, 02:23 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

I worked in the car plant as a tool and die maker from 1976-1983. The west end of the plant had the "A body" body shop and general assembly for Chevelle and Monte Carlo. The east end was for the full sized "B body" Chev and Pontiac. There was a separate Chassis plant as well where the chassis and drive train were assembled and married to the body. In the '60s they built Chev, Pontiac, Olds, and Buick. Now that would have been a tooling nightmare that I wasn't around to see. They even had a small Corvair line at one time. In the '60s, when it would have been interesting, I was in the up town stamping plant learning how to be a tool and die maker. Every year we built a full set of hood and fender dies for the full sized Chev and Pontiac. That ended in about 1970 when model changes became a matter of grille and tail light changes. The body metal basically stayed the same until the 1977 model change. After the year's production run, the dies were greased up and stored in an outdoor compound. Periodically, dies would be brought back into the plant and runs of earlier model fenders would be run on weekends to suppply the GM warehouses. Once the dies weren't needed any more, apprentices, along with a crane operator, were sent out to the field to strip the dies and bring the die shoes in for re-use. How things have changed. Now the dies are just as apt to be built half the way around the world.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.