Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - Canada


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2005, 01:20 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
the term COPO is special in that it represents the 1969 Camaros or Chevelle that were factory built with the 427 engine.

[/ QUOTE ] Thats what we really love here....the Hi Po stuff
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-30-2005, 01:36 AM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

I have a GM of Canada COPO Service Parts catalogue #749 1967-1974. 419 pages of part numbers and descriptions. Haven't see one thing about the 427 Camaros, Chevelles or LT1 Novas. Guess they weren't important enough to be listed. Lots of truck stuff though such as air tank moisture ejection valves etc. Thought I had hit on a gold mine until I started reading.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-30-2005, 01:59 AM
70CitrusZ's Avatar
70CitrusZ 70CitrusZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: B.C ..Canada
Posts: 207
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

In the end,(imho) the only copo's that are of any extra interest due to the "copo" name are the 427 and corvette engine transplant copos or "super cars".

The term supercar is generally assigned to the 427 transplant cars, and I think the only non 427 cars that slip into that group originally are the 350/360hp nova, and perhaps surprisingly, the corvair.
As as side note, although taxi cabs and fleet pick up trucks may have been copo's who cares.
The fact is there were probably a great many copo orders for cars that are of no special interest.

Also, a pace car is cool on its own, but I would not call a 325hp 396 powered Camaro a supercar.
Its an option car like a z-28 or an ss.

Officially, some may very well have been built on a copo basis,but only to facilitate an extended production of a limited time offering, not because of any special performance option.
just my .02.
Mark.
__________________
2012 ZL1 black M6
1968 L36 4 spd Biscayne
1957 270 hp Corvette
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2005, 01:59 AM
hvychev hvychev is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Hey Jeff what about The Stingers, Deuces, Gibb Novas etc?
__________________
Frank Magallon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-30-2005, 02:07 AM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
Hey Jeff what about The Stingers, Deuces, Gibb Novas etc?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I forgot about the LT1 Novas. The Stingers never really jumped out at me as a great performance car like the 427 and LT1's. But like I said, this is what makes the term COPO exciting to me.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-30-2005, 02:18 AM
Pacecarjeff's Avatar
Pacecarjeff Pacecarjeff is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 360
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Geez. I am sorry I even asked.
I guess the only car that should be allowed to use the COPO term,
is a Chevelle, or Camaro with a 427 motor.

Anything else is not worthy so don't ask.

I will just fade back into obscurity with my 1 of 1,
Central Office Production Special Order - Show car.
(COPSO so as not to upset anyone) 1967 Indy Pace Car.

1 of 1 because it is the only BB Canadian Car with no fleet code assigned to it. I was just trying to determine why it was like that.

Sorry to have bothered you "Superduds"
Sorry, I mean - Super-Dudes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-30-2005, 02:50 AM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hey Jeff what about The Stingers, Deuces, Gibb Novas etc?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I forgot about the LT1 Novas. The Stingers never really jumped out at me as a great performance car like the 427 and LT1's. But like I said, this is what makes the term COPO exciting to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey what about the'70 Canadian COPO Novas?? Yenkos that did not get converted.. Factory 350 LT-1 Right?


Phil
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-30-2005, 06:18 AM
SamLBInj SamLBInj is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Depends when I am
Posts: 1,978
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

The word COPO doesnt really mean a whole lot unless its attached to other words such as 427 COPO Chevelle, or 427 COPO Camaro....
__________________
SamLBInj
69 Z/28 X33D80 72-B
H-D 105 FLSTC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-30-2005, 03:32 PM
70 copo 70 copo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: chillicothe Ohio 45601
Posts: 3,834
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,240 Times in 578 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

IMO....This thread and the discussion that it generated is now finished, as the discussion has become non-productive and risks a fight, so additional replyling here seems to be just stirring things up, and then having fun with it. Sad indeed.

This site is where the world comes to learn about COPO's.

Gives us a bad name when irrational opinions are stated here when even the most basic facts from Chevrolet do not support.

For you guys that derailed this thread and posted here saying the only real COPO's were 427 equipped - thus turining the whole thread sour:

You may be on to something that this board has missed since year 2000 and then continued to miss at each reunion...

Suggestion: You know this is kind of an obscure portion of the board, so tell you what-- why don't you 427 only COPO idea guys start a new discussion using these same thaughts the same way- you used them here in this thread(no cheating now!!!) and do it over on the main supercar discussion section of this board.

Seems if you want to argue about a topic as important as
saying a COPO was only really 427 equipped - you need to invite everyone right??

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-30-2005, 04:43 PM
SamLBInj SamLBInj is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Depends when I am
Posts: 1,978
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

I think everyone should remember the name of this website, its called "The SUPERCAR Registry" and you get here by typing in "Yenko.Net"..its not called COPO World, COPO Cars, or whatever. Even Ed Cuneens "COPO Connection" only lists Supercars. Kind of nice that the real Supercar guys let us even talk about our measly Z/28's and SS's..
__________________
SamLBInj
69 Z/28 X33D80 72-B
H-D 105 FLSTC
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.