![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's the ticket John...have a blast!
![]()
__________________
Bruce Choose Life-Donate! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,You should change your location to Foggy Monterey penninsula!
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wouldn't worry about an aluminum driveshaft. Sure, they look neat but the the cost per benefit is not very beneficial. They end up being so thick-walled to match the strength of .083 DOM steel tubing that it's just not worth it. Also the U-joint cups like to gall up in the weld yokes. Spend your money wisely elsewhere, like towards one of those brand new M-22 Muncies after the pain you're going to inflict upon your current M-21 with a new high HP/torque motor!
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22 1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I wouldn't worry about an aluminum driveshaft. Sure, they look neat but the the cost per benefit is not very beneficial. They end up being so thick-walled to match the strength of .083 DOM steel tubing that it's just not worth it. Also the U-joint cups like to gall up in the weld yokes. Spend your money wisely elsewhere, like towards one of those brand new M-22 Muncies after the pain you're going to inflict upon your current M-21 with a new high HP/torque motor! [/ QUOTE ] Thanks for the advice on that one Mark,I'll have to do more research I guess. Jason, Hey,we got SOME sun in Marina yesterday! ![]()
__________________
1967 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 HRM featured car '69 Z/28 Yellow/Aug '07 CHP cover car '70 Z/28 R/S Orange/Jan '08 CHP featured car '70 Chevelle SS454 LS-5 Red/Jan '11 CHP cover car |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ever consider a 377 or an even larger big bore short stroke engine, it would rev like the 302. swap out the trans if its correct to the car or the crate motor may eat it up too.
__________________
69 camaro |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
ever consider a 377 or an even larger big bore short stroke engine, it would rev like the 302. swap out the trans if its correct to the car or the crate motor may eat it up too. [/ QUOTE ] I have considered that route as well.I'm hoping my M-21 will be strong enough to withstand the wrath of the crate motor.I may even send it out to have it re-freshened.
__________________
1967 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 HRM featured car '69 Z/28 Yellow/Aug '07 CHP cover car '70 Z/28 R/S Orange/Jan '08 CHP featured car '70 Chevelle SS454 LS-5 Red/Jan '11 CHP cover car |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well guys,pulled the motor out today and it's basically toast.Broke two rods and the cam in several places.It had already been sleeved in the number 1 cylinder.No failure there though.The bottom of the cylinder walls got pretty chewed up and the crank journels are junk.
So much for building that motor,huh? ![]() My buddies and I are arguing whether to have a 302 built or just buy a high-hp 383 stroker.It would cost me the same either way.At this point,I'm thinking of just shelving the 302 idea for now and just picking up the phone. 383/550hp $6699 ![]() ![]() ![]() What do you all think...again?
__________________
1967 Buick Skylark GS400 Funny Car "Ingenue"...World's only Buick-powered Buick Funny Car/Aug '10 HRM featured car '69 Z/28 Yellow/Aug '07 CHP cover car '70 Z/28 R/S Orange/Jan '08 CHP featured car '70 Chevelle SS454 LS-5 Red/Jan '11 CHP cover car |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|