Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Other Muscle


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #241  
Old 12-10-2004, 08:02 AM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Mike did you build your 69 bird somewhat after the mule you talked about, or is that actually it?

Another pic courtesy of Andy:


Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 12-10-2004, 08:16 AM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

I was just going through my last mag that Andy sent and wow, coverage on the Pure Stock Drags 99. Some VERY nice cars and impressive times!!! Loved to see Paul Glasgo's Magnum 400 cranking some 12's. And then his brother does a low 13 in a 455HO, right in line with this thread I'd say.

I too don't think there is a need to compare these drags to cars off the assembly line in 1969, but the drags get top rating with me. And I cheer all that do it..


Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 12-10-2004, 10:12 AM
Pantera Pantera is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tulsa OKLA
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: Judges

If you will think back to those early days in the late 60's, that is why Joel Rosen the owner of Motion was so succesful, because he had a dyno at his disposal and very few back then did. With one he could ferret out how to do the little things to go fast.

He also got a lot of help from those in the right places at the factory. It has taken a few years but everybody has just caught up with the top guns of the past. Now days you can find a dyno in just about every town of any size.

I don't know about you but I have seen plenty of guys over the years that out "Tricked" themselves with add on speed equiptment that they had no way to properly tune and set up right.

Blueprinting a stock motor was just not done back then. It has taken all these years for the technogly to come as far forward as it has. Remember a dual line Holly was something new and most guys had been using AFB's, single line Hollys or Rochester Q-jet carbs.

Et's are bound to keep droping with the interest there is in it and the lack of new cars to interest guys of our era.

Nothing wrong with the Ricer's that are going as fast and faster than hell these days. I still miss my '85 CRX si that I used to suprise some late model muscle cars with.


Pantera
__________________
70 BM Phase III GT Vette
69 BM SS427 GT vette?
69 L78 Nova 7k mi
73 Pantera
69 Vette B/P SCCA
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 12-10-2004, 06:42 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Judges

[ QUOTE ]
I wasn't ragging on any of the Pure Stock Certified guys, a lot of work went into those cars. I said that the way the cars run TODAY do not reflect how they ran back THEN.

[/ QUOTE ]
Then why didn't ya say so! Seriously, you're absolutely right...the quicker cars aren't indicative of what I'd call "showroom stock". Now, I did take our Camaro, build the engine as Chevrolet did back in '69 (10.2:1 compression), and with only a set of spring clamps it went 12.79@108. But that's another story for another day...

I think tuning is a lost art, and has been for some time...I mean, most people take the easy way out and throw on a set of headers and a big carb on their car, and pick up 5 tenths...what they don't know is that they could play with the jetting/timing and all the other tuning stuff and very possibly make up that 5 tenths, without the headers. Now, I'm not saying headers aren't ultimately gonna make more power, but the potential these old sleds have from the factory is there, "if" you can get it out.

As for tearing down the short block, I often wonder too, but short of an oil pan with an inspection cover, I guess we'll have to take their word for it. And weight..oh, don't get me started on weight! Pete currently has a ZL-1 engine in his COPO car, thus he saved 200+ pounds...but like you said, if I could shed some pounds, I'd be in the hunt. But I really hate to do that to a 30,000 mile original car!
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 12-12-2004, 09:25 PM
gtaa9 gtaa9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Apple Valley CA.
Posts: 286
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

This is off the subject but I'll ask.Do you think Pontiac will come out with a restro look for the new GTO down the road?
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 12-12-2004, 09:29 PM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Some guys were talking over in Classical Pontiac about the retro Camaro that is being toyed at GM, they all agreed that it looked awesome. And they also all agreed that GM would never produced something everyone liked.

I agree with both.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 12-12-2004, 09:38 PM
gtaa9 gtaa9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Apple Valley CA.
Posts: 286
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Well it would be nice to see a restro GTO with the Judge option in 3-5yrs.I would buy one.
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 12-12-2004, 10:07 PM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Why 3 to 5 years, now!!!!


Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 12-12-2004, 11:24 PM
gtaa9 gtaa9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Apple Valley CA.
Posts: 286
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Your right now would be good but realistically no.My reasoning is because with the new restro style of the new mustang,the new mustang looks like the 1965 mustang fastback as far as style is concerned so it took 40yrs for the mustang to look light the old style.The GTO came out as a 1964 year model and lastest to 1974.Then in 2004 40yrs since the first GTO's hit the streets the GTO is out again NO RESTO STYLE at all so I'm guessing 3-5yrs before pontiac gos to the old style again.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 12-13-2004, 04:58 AM
GOAT72 GOAT72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Culpeper County, VA
Posts: 362
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Judges

Last night they rebroadcast "The Last Ride" on NBC and they had a commercial for the '05. I'm not happy with the new GTO as far as retro styling goes - since there IS none, but I have to admit that steps are being taken in the right direction.
The hood scoops are totally brazen and well-designed, the split rear exhausts and bigger rear spoiler are great as well.

The 400HP engine is nothing to sneeze at, while 4 ft & rr bucket seats look fantastic!

If the trend continues we may see a pretty nice-looking GTO by '07!

Mac
__________________
Love Pontiacs? Read the all-new PONTIAC JOURNAL from Performance Years!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.