Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Let's just call it Survivour with the accent mark.
Or Supervivor for the survivor supercar. I believe that like I said before they have waited too long to defend their trademark. Because Bloomington did not go after everyone (did they go after anyone?) in the past and defend it, I do not believe that they have a case. I am not a lawyer but did study some trademark and patent law. If they would have coined a new word or phrase such as "BG survivor" or "Gold Survivor" or Bloomington Survivor I could see the infringment but come on. Just write the ad as "69 Yenko 15,000 miles all original paint and interior has survived untouched." Then it seems as though they really have no case.
__________________
~JAG~ NCRS#65120 68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car #21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built. 71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist. NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros, Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes & a Chevelle or two... Survivors, restored cars, & other photos https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about "rovivrus" (survivor spelled backwards). but seriously, many of the moparphiles out there remember the mid-80s when Chrysler slammed down on anyone using the term "mopar" anywhere in anything. At the time most people thought "mopar" was a slang term but it was actually the original parts division name (like GM's Delco) of Chrysler "MOtor PARts." They went way overboard in their legal attacks and the hobby struck back furiously with publicized boycots of new vehicles and some very innovative other methods, including t-shirts depicting Chrylser's Gen Counsel with a giant screwdriver, screwing a roadrunner to the wall. Due to the backlash of thier own customer base, they eventually backed off of their zero tolerence policy due to all of the bad publicity. When it comes to trademarks, a company has to vigorously protect the mark or it becomes part of the public domain, like "Jeep" and "Kleenex" and they lose their rights to it.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Words cannot be patented. However, they can be protected and "owned" for a specific use by obtaining a trademark. The trademark has to be used in interstate commerce. Therefore you cannot trademark a term just for kicks.
There are approximately 50 different trademarks registered for "survivor". They apply for a variety of items including a Timex watch, tub caulk, etc. Bloomington's trademark for Survivor is registered as "Authenticating certain automobiles". This is a real can of worms as this is very broad. What certain automobiles? This broad swipe should never have been allowed (but the patent attorney did good - that's their goal: broad!) It is unlikely we, as individuals, will be served for using "survivor" in an internet ad as a description of a car. However, the Hemmings notice is probably the tip of the iceburg and I'm sure all of the major ad venues will get a letter. I don't think it is a big deal. Misuse of these words has been a pet peeve of mine for years. "Original" has been misused for years as has "survivor". And yes, describing your original (never painted, detailed, etc.) car as "survived" is AOK. By the way, for those of us who really know and appreciate what a truly original car is, you might be surprised at the very few cars that really are untouched originals and have SURVIVED. ![]() Dave |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|