![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
This has the 351C 4V with a 4spd... I was reading some "stock" 1/4 mile times of some of these cars and suprisingly the "BOSS Mach 1" was only a hi 14 second to a low 15 second car... It had to be the gearing, no?? [/ QUOTE ] A Boss and a Mach I are two different models. The Mach I came with the 351 Windsor in 1969. It had a 2bbl. standard, 4bbl. optional. From there, there was the 390 and the 428 Cobra Jet. In 1970, the 4bbl. engine was of the Cleveland variant, which was a new engine despite sharing the 351 size. These engines are much better, apples to apples. However, most people in the hobby prefer the '69. A stock 351 is probably no better than a high-14 car stock. There are few small-cube engines that are faster, such as the Boss 351 from 1971, W-31 Oldses, 340 Mopars, and L79 and LT1 Chevys. . . come to think of it, if you like the Olds, why not find a W-31? It's got everything going for it: rarity, looks, and performance. If you're leaning towards the Camaro, that's fine. I don 't think you'll be disappointed, and if you want a 4-speed, you can sell it later for something that wouldn't equate to a loss for you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The Mach I came with the 351 Windsor in 1969. It had a 2bbl. standard, 4bbl. optional. From there, there was the 390 and the 428 Cobra Jet. In 1970, the 4bbl. engine was of the Cleveland variant, which was a new engine despite sharing the 351 size. These engines are much better, apples to apples. However, most people in the hobby prefer the '69. [/ QUOTE ] For some reason I thought the 351 Cleveland was available in the '69 Mach 1. ![]() If you want to just get in and DRIVE the car with (or without) the wife n' kids, go for the Z! It sounds like a gas n' go deal and you can't go wrong with the investment... or styling. ![]() But if the Mach I does have a 351 C, then I would think of investment potential. I heard the Clevelands are scarce. ![]() Again, 442w30 is probably right, and the engine wasn't available in 1969. All-in-all, being a Ponchohead, I'd vote for the 'Bird if'n it was me! ![]() ~Goat72
__________________
Love Pontiacs? Read the all-new PONTIAC JOURNAL from Performance Years! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd first say the Olds because its more unique, less common and cheap. However $12,500 for a near mint 71 Z-28 with the RS trim package? IMO That's a steal even if it is an automatic.
![]()
__________________
Jeff ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Z28 would be my choice being you have a tight budget,also because you described it as near mint.The others will have to have more $$ spent and you never really know how much until you get started on one!Plus that model Z is starting to increase in value due to availiabilty of other older models.Just my 2 cents worth.Plus some women don't like it too much when you start spending grocery money on your Classic Car and the children start loosing weight(LOL)
![]() Bobby |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|