![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, leave the 70 455HO with it's smaller D-port heads out of the question of this thread. Compare the 70 400RAIV with round port heads, and 71 455HO with round port heads. I notice the factory rating on each as: 70 400RAIV 370HP/5500RPM versus 71 455HO 335HP/4400RPM. Would it be true that the 71 HP is peaked out at 4400RPM. That's at 1100RPM under the RAIV rating, which seems to be very low RPM to rate its maximum HP. That is how the L88's were rated less than L71's in the Vettes.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These engines all used the same intakes and exhaust, the 70-71 were in heavier cars.
However: The best breathing heads were 70 400 RAIV's Followed by 69 400 RAIV's Next would be 71 455 HO heads, slightly less flow on intake Finally would be 72 455 HO heads, even slightly less flow in exhaust area. Pontiac engineers knew at this time, compression ratios were falling, and were trying to get as much torque as they could out of the heads, and not worry about upper RPM air flow, as the 400 RAIV's were built. The 455 HO's also did NOT use a RAIV cam although the heads were similar they used the earlier MUCH milder 068 (tripower) cam. Again due to emissions and better low rpm cylinder fill with low compression on those heads. A 455HO does have a lower rpm peak than a 400.However The 400 RAIV's were underated, as several magazine dyno test have been done (even recently) and showed in stock form they produced 400-420HP. The 455 HO with its emission friendly cam has had dyno test in the neighbor hood of 360-370HP, if I remember correctly. The 4400 peak HP rating is definitely too low, and probably rated that way on purpose, to satisfy then very restrictive insurance rules.
__________________
http://www.stockappearingdrags.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However the 73 455 SD was the best of all of these. Even though rated at 310(290) net HP.
The 73 455 Sd intake was cast iron, by emission necessity. So it was fair in performance. The 73 455SD heads out flow any other Pontiac heads made, other than RAV Tunnel ports. I have 2 sets of these and one going on a 73'T/A I'm building. At the time were said to out flow even HEMI heads! Although this is not true. What is true is that the heads were meticuously cast. Meaning most factory heads (any brand)have large casting differences among them, even within years. Depending upon the casting machine you could get a good LS6 head or a fair LS6 head. One that is clean and one that has casting imperfections in the passages, or even half closed passages alltogether. This is true of all brands. The 73 455SD heads were all made very well. I have never seen a crappy one. They used slightly bigger Ram Air type exhaust manifolds than even the RAIV /455HO's. As mike said: Today a 455SD with the original planned RAIV cam in it, and uncorked exhaust, 10 to 1 compression.. is a bad ass. One that is capable of staying with anything ever built in the muscle car era. Even in 1973 HotRod magazine tested one with 3.42 gears at [email protected] you read the article they mentioned that they had the air conditioning on while track testing it!! Other tests by other mamagzines were similar. As a side bonus if you have ever driven a 70-74 Trans AM, they make any 60's muscle car feel like you are driving a school bus. They handle virtually like today's cars.
__________________
http://www.stockappearingdrags.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am rebuilding a 73 SD engine right now. Do you recommend 10-1 and a RAIV cam ? Solid or hyd ? Will it idle with AC ?
__________________
...... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The SD455 heads are so rare and valuable today that it's a shame to port or shave them in any way. The original SD455 was designed with the RAIV cam. The prototypes used the RAIV cam, but couldn't pass emissions (there's a whole story about that that's pretty cool)
![]() The skies the limit if you want to build it with "secret" parts. Aluminum rods, lightweight pistons, hydraulic roller, it really depends what you want to do with it, and if sounding totally stock is a priority.
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't need anything exotic as it will still not see much driving. If I wanna go fast I have other stuff. I know I need to bore it and put new pistons so I might as well go 10-1. The cam looks fine but if there is a good hyd cam that would compliment the 10-1 and still idle well I should go for it. I am told intake gaskets are hard to find and the repo ones fall apart, any suggestions ?
__________________
...... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Charely
There are 10 and half dozen ways to build a Pontiac, but to think you won't go fast in it... that is a huge mistake. The majority of stock components adjust the compression with head cc and gasket crush. I believe you have a SD, if memory serves me correct. You will probably want to stick with the factory heads. TRW (Seal Power or whoever they are now) did make a shelf piston for those rods, it only had two valve reliefs. If you find some nice .015 crush gaskets, run a zero deck, and mill the heads accordingly to achieve your final compression ratio.... I think you will be happy. Running low 12's with a 9.5 455, is a piece of cake and you get to use pump gas. Then again maybe you will want a highway cruiser. Some of the old cross country racers use to order these SD's with the highway gears, and achieve some serious cruising speeds. Steve ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Even in 1973 HotRod magazine tested one with 3.42 gears at [email protected] you read the article they mentioned that they had the air conditioning on while track testing it!! [/ QUOTE ] Unfortunately, that wasn't with the production cam. Darn Feds... |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob, that was true, but what was so impressive was that that SD455 ran that time with 8.4 compression, weighing 3800 lbs, a ridiculously 3.42 rear gear, emission equipment, and an EGR on a steel intake. Simply amazing in any era, not to mention 1973!
![]()
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The SD455 head is truly the best head from a performance standpoint, but the huge chamber on the head, required to maintain low compression, was a killer.
On the topic of port comparisons and port flow, the SD455 stands alone. The Pontiac Engineers hogged the SD455 head intake runner out so much that they broke through the pushrod bulge (the main airflow obstruction on a Pontiac head) within the runners. They remedied this by inserting special pushrod tubes in those runners. They also raised the port roof so high that they broke through the valve cover bolt holes. Tuners soon found out about this, as many Pontiac people replaced the factory rocker arm lock nuts with adjustable versions for a few more rpms on the SD455. With the engine idling, setting the adjustable polylocks proved to be difficult. The engine is idling, the valve cover is off, and you're wondering why the engine is dying? On the SD455 cars, removing the valve cover bolts over those runners caused a massive vacuum leak. ![]() Seems a little extreme for 1973, but the SD455 was the Pontiac bad boy that made it to the party too late. Pete McCarthy did some serious flow work tests a while ago, and ran all the Pontiac heads through a Superflow. There was always some debate on what was truly the best street head. Best performance head : 1970 Ram Air IV Best intake port : 1969-70 Ram Air V Best exhaust port : 1968 1/2 Ram Air II Best D-port head : No.16, No.48, No.12 (tie) Best low-compression D-port head : No.96(1971) Best low-compression post-1972 head : No. 6X Best balanced head (exhaust to intake) : 1963 421 SD Best low-lift (under .400) head : 1967 No.670 Worst exhaust-to-intake port ratio : 1969-70 Ram Air V Worst intake-to exhaust ratio : 1968 1/2 Ram Air II Biggest surprise : Intake port, No.17 350 head Biggest disappointment : 1969-70 RA V, 1973-74 455 SD (tie) Biggest "sleeper" : 1975 No. 5C Most undercammed : 1963 SD, 1971 455 HO, 1973-74 455 SD (tie) Most underexhausted : 1964 GTO (No.9770716) Most potential for porting : 1973-74 455 SD, 1968 1/2 RA II (tie)
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|