Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Other Muscle


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2004, 05:19 PM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Didn't the 455 have a silly amount of torque ?? 500 or so...what is the diff between BOP 10 bolt and Chevrolet ?
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-23-2004, 05:27 PM
StealthBird StealthBird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 95 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

The RAIV cam was the first computer designed camshaft in the industry. It was so effective, the camshaft is still widely used even today in Pontiac rebuilds, even with 35+ years of aftermarket cam grind technology available. Besides, we don't know any better.

The predecessor to the 1969 RAIV was the 1968-1/2 RAII. The RAII was basically a RAIV, but without the RAIV 1.65 high lift rocker arms, and without the nifty RAIV two-piece aluminum intake. On paper, the RAIV was a stronger combo.

But Jim Mino's 1968 RAII Firebirds seem to tell a different story. There has been a lot of speculation as to why the RAIV doesn't seem to do as well as the RAII and 455HO in the shootouts. In all honesty, I firmly believe that no one has really taken a RAIV to the same level that Mino took his RAII Firebird (or Jensen with his 455HO car). Those guys had a firm understanding of the Pontiac drivetrain, head flow, etc., and spent a great deal of time and effort assembling their combos. It appeared as if they were cheating, but they weren't. It was hard to believe a little 400, rated at a measly 340 hp, or a low compression 455 rated at 335 hp, could beat up on on so many high compression, big cube, solid lifter cars, 400 + hp cars, but they did. Mino's 68 Firebird was a lightweight, and so was Jensen's GT-37, but not "cheater" lightweight. They just found cars that were originally ordered in a street racer way. Jim Mino did a thorough teardown of his RAII a few years ago for a magazine, and showed every conceivable part of his 400 to the cameras. It was absoltely bone stock, unported, unmolested. He just assembled the engine with great care.

Pontiac 400's and 455's are low revving combos. They were so effective on the street because most street races lasted about 5-10 seconds, and during that time a person cannot take advantage of a 6000 + redline. Pontiacs focused on a broad torque curve rather than peak hp, and that made for a great street racer.
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com

DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-23-2004, 07:31 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Hey Mike! Talk about your good running Ponchos! I'd still love to see that 'Bird of yours in action! But only if I get a "spot"!

Pete can jump in here if this is wrong, but I *believe* the Glasgo's have a '70 IV TA that they run at the PS events. If I'm not mistaken, it's in the high 12-range, and looks KILLER. One of Minos old RAII 'Birds is running PS with us, as well as another RAII 'Bird. I was sandwiched between these 2 cars in Stanton last year with my 12.47. And Jensen's HO car is sleeper if there ever was one...but you'd better choke up if you're gonna tangle with that T-37! Hard to go wrong with any of those packages.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-23-2004, 10:59 PM
StealthBird StealthBird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,127
Thanks: 1
Thanked 95 Times in 43 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

There was also a BOP 12-bolt, which was essentially a 10-bolt with a 12-bolt cover. This was the rear end that made it into the BOP heavy duty applications in 70-72. It uses bolt in axles, not c-clips, and the cover has a different shape. This is what's under my 69 Firebird.

Rob, thanks for the I really have to make the trip to see these Pure Stocks in person. BTW, they just released those coveted RAII/RAIV exhaust manifolds for the 67-69 Firebirds, and believe it or not, they have a version with a 3" collector! I was seriously thinking of going back to RAIV heads and using these manifolds to see what would happen, but I realize some of the really serious "stock" guys have a lot more serious internal engine mods than I care to perform right now. I still have a hydraulic cam, cast rods, and big ol' TRW slugs.
__________________
1959-1980 Pontiac Window Sticker Reproductions : PontiacWindowStickers.com

DVD's for Musclecar fans! MusclecarFilms.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:21 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

You Poncho guys got it all...bolt in axles, 3" mani outlets! What's next, pre-ported intakes! LOL!

Don't count out that ole 'Bird! That thing would be in the hunt no matter where you run. But, some food for thought. You could swap your headers for manifolds and go the Stock Appearing route...or...you could leave the car alone and run in the newly founded "MP" class. Basically "stock" cars with headers (closed) and a couple of other little mods allowed, kinda like back in the day. And coincidently, the Supercar Reunion is hosting an MP event along with our normal Supercar festivities at Gateway International! And since you're just up the road, I fully expect to see that Poncho picking on some poor unsuspecting Mopars! Oh, here's the rules.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-24-2004, 12:48 AM
Astock Astock is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.Calif.
Posts: 843
Thanks: 62
Thanked 211 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Thanks for posting the info on the MP class.That's really good news.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-23-2004, 06:53 PM
yellowjudge yellowjudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Hi, the 71 455 HO TA only received a 10 bolt, 3:08,42,73 ratios. I think the 455 H.O. great street mtr, just does not have the mystique of the RAIV. I have both, the H.O&gt; a better cruising car.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-23-2004, 07:22 PM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,985
Thanks: 498
Thanked 4,776 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

The Pontiac 10 bolt is stronger than a Chevy 10 bolt. Might have 10 bolts but it is better.
__________________
......
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-23-2004, 07:27 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Is the BOP 10 bolt like the later Chevrolet 10 bolt?
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-23-2004, 10:27 PM
yellowjudge yellowjudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ram Air IV versus 455 HO

Hey Charlie, you won't get any static from me on that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.